Heyman Gail D, Diesendruck Gil
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2002 May;38(3):407-17. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.3.407.
Children's reasoning about the stability of human psychological characteristics was investigated in relation to the obligatory distinction between the Spanish verb forms ser and estar (which convey different information about the stability of characteristics) and the corresponding English form to be. Participants (85 bilingual children, ages 6 to 10 years) were interviewed to determine (a) whether the ser/estar distinction is relevant to reasoning about the stability of human characteristics and (b) whether beliefs about the stability of psychological characteristics relate to differences in the use of ser and estar to describe and explain social events. Children treated ser and to be as more likely than estar to convey the stability of psychological characteristics. Children who tended to endorse stable views of psychological characteristics were especially likely to use the ser form in their descriptions and explanations.
研究了儿童对人类心理特征稳定性的推理,该推理与西班牙语动词形式ser和estar(它们传达有关特征稳定性的不同信息)和相应的英语形式to be之间的强制性区别有关。对参与者(85名6至10岁的双语儿童)进行了访谈,以确定:(a)ser/estar的区别是否与对人类特征稳定性的推理相关;(b)关于心理特征稳定性的信念是否与使用ser和estar来描述和解释社会事件的差异有关。儿童认为ser和to be比estar更有可能传达心理特征的稳定性。倾向于认同心理特征稳定观点的儿童在描述和解释中特别有可能使用ser形式。