• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性护理医院中压疮风险筛查:一种简短床边量表的开发

Screening for pressure ulcer risk in an acute care hospital: development of a brief bedside scale.

作者信息

Perneger Thomas V, Raë Anne Claire, Gaspoz Jean Michel, Borst François, Vitek Olga, Héliot Céliane

机构信息

Quality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):498-504. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00514-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00514-5
PMID:12007553
Abstract

To derive a brief bedside pressure ulcer prediction tool for patients admitted to acute care hospitals, we conducted a prospective study of first pressure ulcer incidence among 1,190 consecutive patients hospitalized in selected wards of a Swiss teaching hospital. Baseline predictors included patient age and items from the Norton and Braden ulcer prediction scales. During follow-up, 170 patients developed new pressure ulcers. The predictive ability of baseline assessments decayed over time. Occurrence of first pressure ulcer in the 5 days after admission (129 events) was best predicted by patient age (5 levels), mobility (3 levels), mental status (3 levels), and friction/shear (3 levels). The Fragmment score (sum of friction, age, mobility, mental status) was linearly related to pressure ulcer risk, and its area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.80) was higher than for the Norton (0.74; P = 0.006) and Braden (0.74; P = 0.004) scores. This brief pressure ulcer prediction scale performed well in an acute care setting. Use of this scale may facilitate the implementation of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.

摘要

为了得出一种适用于急症医院住院患者的简易床旁压疮预测工具,我们对瑞士一家教学医院特定病房连续收治的1190例患者的首次压疮发生率进行了一项前瞻性研究。基线预测因素包括患者年龄以及诺顿和布拉德恩压疮预测量表中的项目。在随访期间,170例患者出现了新的压疮。基线评估的预测能力随时间衰减。入院后5天内首次发生压疮(129例事件)的最佳预测因素为患者年龄(5个等级)、活动能力(3个等级)、精神状态(3个等级)和摩擦力/剪切力(3个等级)。碎片评分(摩擦力、年龄、活动能力、精神状态的总和)与压疮风险呈线性相关,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积(0.80)高于诺顿量表(0.74;P = 0.006)和布拉德恩量表(0.74;P = 0.004)。这种简易压疮预测量表在急症护理环境中表现良好。使用该量表可能有助于实施压疮预防干预措施。

相似文献

1
Screening for pressure ulcer risk in an acute care hospital: development of a brief bedside scale.急性护理医院中压疮风险筛查:一种简短床边量表的开发
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):498-504. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00514-5.
2
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
3
Contribution of individual items to the performance of the Norton pressure ulcer prediction scale.各个项目对诺顿压疮预测量表性能的贡献。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1282-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04547.x.
4
Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.压疮风险评估量表的有效性;库宾和杰克逊量表、布拉登量表及道格拉斯量表
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00135-4.
5
All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.并非所有高危患者都一样:分析布雷登压疮风险评分以识别特定风险。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):282-91. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182435715.
6
Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting.4种风险评估量表对医院环境中压疮发生预测的预测效度。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Feb;27(2):70-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000439059.72199.41.
7
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
8
Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neurologic intensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中压疮的发生率。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):283-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00011.
9
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: risk factors and use of preventive devices.医院获得性压疮:危险因素及预防装置的使用
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 28;158(17):1940-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.17.1940.
10
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with pressure ulcers among middle-old and oldest-old inpatients in an acute care hospital.急性护理医院中老年及高龄住院患者中与压疮相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03937-1.
2
Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods.压力性损伤发生风险预测工具:对报告模型开发与验证方法的系统评价的伞状综述
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Jan 14;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00182-4.
3
Surgery duration: Optimized prediction and causality analysis.
手术时间:优化预测与因果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273831. eCollection 2022.
4
Pressure Ulcers Risk Assessment According to Nursing Criteria.根据护理标准进行压疮风险评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;10(8):1438. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081438.
5
Risk Factors for Pressure Injuries in Adult Patients: A Narrative Synthesis.成人压力性损伤的危险因素:叙事性综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020761.
6
The Incidence of Pressure Ulcers and its Associations in Different Wards of the Hospital: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医院不同病房压力性溃疡的发生率及其关联:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Int J Prev Med. 2020 Oct 5;11:171. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_182_19. eCollection 2020.
7
Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的电刺激
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 22;1(1):CD012196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012196.pub2.
8
Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.压力性损伤的电刺激:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Nov 8;17(14):1-106. eCollection 2017.
9
Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).新型压疮风险评估工具——压疮风险初级或次级评估工具(PURPOSE T)的临床评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):407-424. doi: 10.1111/jan.13444. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Exploring the role of pain as an early predictor of category 2 pressure ulcers: a prospective cohort study.探索疼痛作为2期压疮早期预测指标的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 20;7(1):e013623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013623.