• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CT血管造影术在颈动脉粥样硬化评估中的应用

CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery atherosclerosis.

作者信息

Berg M H, Manninen H I, Räsänen H T, Vanninen R L, Jaakkola P A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2002 Mar;43(2):116-24. doi: 10.1080/028418502127347763.

DOI:10.1080/028418502127347763
PMID:12010286
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of CT angiography (CTA) to detect atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries in comparison with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (3D TOF MRA), using contrast angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Contrast angiography and CTA were performed in 31 patients (mean age 65 years, range 45-79). The image quality was evaluated, atherosclerotic lesions were registered, and diameter stenosis degree was visually estimated from axial source images of CTA and 3D TOF MRA (21 patients), and results of interpretations were compared. The comparison of quantitative measurements was performed using IVUS as a reference.

RESULTS

Contrast angiography detected 51 lesions (mean diameter stenosis 50%, range 10-100%), and CTA detected all same lesions. CTA provided better image quality and consistency of image interpretation than 3D TOF MRA. IVUS verified 29 atherosclerotic lesions with a mean diameter stenosis of 35%, (range 4-40%). CTA yielded a sensitivity of 96% to 100% (< or =10% or < or =20% diameter stenosis regarded as normal) for the detection of lesions with reference to IVUS.

CONCLUSION

CTA seems feasible and accurate for the detection of atherosclerosis in carotid arteries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对比CT血管造影(CTA)与三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(3D TOF MRA)检测颈动脉粥样硬化的能力,以对比血管造影和血管内超声(IVUS)作为参照标准。

材料与方法

对31例患者(平均年龄65岁,范围45 - 79岁)进行了对比血管造影和CTA检查。评估图像质量,记录动脉粥样硬化病变,并从CTA和3D TOF MRA的轴位源图像上目测估计直径狭窄程度(21例患者),并对解读结果进行比较。以IVUS作为参照标准进行定量测量比较。

结果

对比血管造影检测到51处病变(平均直径狭窄50%,范围10 - 100%),CTA检测到了所有相同病变。与3D TOF MRA相比,CTA提供了更好的图像质量和图像解读一致性。IVUS证实了29处动脉粥样硬化病变,平均直径狭窄35%(范围4 - 40%)。以IVUS为参照,CTA对病变检测的敏感度为96%至100%(直径狭窄≤10%或≤20%视为正常)。

结论

CTA在检测颈动脉粥样硬化方面似乎可行且准确。

相似文献

1
CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery atherosclerosis.CT血管造影术在颈动脉粥样硬化评估中的应用
Acta Radiol. 2002 Mar;43(2):116-24. doi: 10.1080/028418502127347763.
2
Mild carotid artery atherosclerosis: assessment by 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, with reference to intravascular ultrasound imaging and contrast angiography.轻度颈动脉粥样硬化:通过三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影进行评估,并与血管内超声成像和对比血管造影作对照
Stroke. 1999 Apr;30(4):827-33. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.4.827.
3
[Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].双能量CT血管造影术用于评估颈内动脉狭窄和闭塞
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009 Apr;31(2):215-20.
4
Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.三维CT血管造影术在评估颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄方面的临床应用及问题:与传统血管造影术、磁共振血管造影术及超声检查的比较
Surg Neurol. 1999 Mar;51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00117-7.
5
3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.3T对比增强磁共振血管造影术用于评估颅内动脉:与时间飞跃磁共振血管造影术及多层螺旋CT血管造影术的比较
Invest Radiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):799-805. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000242835.00032.f5.
6
[Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].[利用飞行时间磁共振血管造影和CT血管造影评估颈动脉的横截面积和直径]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;67(4):367-73. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.67.367.
7
Bone subtraction CTA for transcranial arteries: intra-individual comparison with standard CTA without bone subtraction and TOF-MRA.颅外动脉 CT 血管成像去骨减影:与标准 CTA 去骨减影和 TOF-MRA 的个体内比较。
Clin Radiol. 2010 Jun;65(6):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.彩色多谱勒超声、CT 血管造影和血池增强磁共振血管造影诊断颈动脉狭窄的准确性:与 DSA 对 170 例患者的对比研究。
Radiol Med. 2012 Feb;117(1):54-71. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0651-3. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
9
Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.颈动脉狭窄的检测:两种非增强磁共振血管造影与双源CT血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Dec;35(12):2360-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4073. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA.去骨双能量 CTA 对颅外动脉:与无去骨标准 CTA 和 TOF-MRA 的个体内比较。
Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov;16(11):1348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque Ulceration: Comparison of Advanced Imaging Modalities and Recent Developments.颈动脉粥样硬化斑块溃疡的影像学检查:先进成像模式的比较与最新进展
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):664-671. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5026. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Safety of embolic protection device-assisted and unprotected intravascular ultrasound in evaluating carotid artery atherosclerotic lesions.血管内超声评估颈动脉粥样硬化病变中使用血管内保护装置辅助与未使用保护装置的安全性。
Med Sci Monit. 2012 Feb;18(2):MT7-18. doi: 10.12659/msm.882452.
3
Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.
颈动脉狭窄:自动三维CT血管造影分析方法的可重复性
Eur Radiol. 2004 Apr;14(4):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2130-2. Epub 2003 Nov 14.
4
Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:椭圆中心对比增强磁共振血管造影和螺旋CT血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 May;24(5):1012-9.