Suppr超能文献

电话访谈:它与诠释现象学研究兼容吗?

Telephone interviewing: is it compatible with interpretive phenomenological research?

作者信息

Sweet Linda

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia.

出版信息

Contemp Nurse. 2002 Feb;12(1):58-63. doi: 10.5172/conu.12.1.58.

Abstract

The telephone has long been used as a medium of communication. In more recent years the telephone has become a legitimate tool in marketing and survey research (Barriball et al. 1996). Telephone interviewing is becoming an increasingly popular form of interview for qualitative research (Carr & Worth 2001). Whilst there have been discussions in the literature on logistical advantages and disadvantages of telephone interviewing, there has been little debate as to whether this form of interview is compatible with qualitative health research. Much of the literature reporting this interview method is based on quantitative or structured questionnaire style research under the guise of 'qualitative' research. So the question remains: Is the telephone interview compatible with interpretive phenomenological research? This paper describes how telephone interviewing was used in a recently conducted interpretive phenomenological study, and argues that this is a methodologically and economically valuable data collection technique in qualitative research. Qualitative researchers should not rely exclusively on the face-to-face interview, as the telephone interview can be an equally valuable data collection approach.

摘要

长期以来,电话一直被用作一种沟通媒介。近年来,电话已成为营销和调查研究中的一种合理工具(巴里博尔等人,1996年)。电话访谈正日益成为定性研究中一种流行的访谈形式(卡尔和沃思,2001年)。虽然文献中已有关于电话访谈在后勤方面优缺点的讨论,但对于这种访谈形式是否适用于定性健康研究,却鲜有争论。许多报道这种访谈方法的文献都是基于以“定性”研究为幌子的定量或结构化问卷式研究。所以问题依然存在:电话访谈是否适用于解释现象学研究?本文描述了电话访谈在最近一项解释现象学研究中的应用方式,并认为这是定性研究中一种在方法上和经济上都有价值的数据收集技术。定性研究人员不应仅仅依赖面对面访谈,因为电话访谈同样可以是一种有价值的数据收集方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验