• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health effects of the gas-aerosol complex. Report to Special Committee on Health and Ecological Effects of Increased Coal Utilization.气体-气溶胶复合体对健康的影响。提交给煤炭使用增加对健康和生态影响特别委员会的报告。
Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Dec;33:191-202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7933191.
2
Environmental effects of increased coal utilization: ecological effects of gaseous emissions from coal combustion.煤炭利用增加的环境影响:煤炭燃烧气态排放物的生态影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Dec;33:249-72. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7933249.
3
Inhalation health effects of fine particles from the co-combustion of coal and refuse derived fuel.煤与垃圾衍生燃料共燃烧产生的细颗粒物对吸入健康的影响。
Chemosphere. 2003 Jun;51(10):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00720-8.
4
Biomedically relevant chemical and physical properties of coal combustion products.煤燃烧产物的生物医学相关化学和物理性质。
Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Jan;47:189-99. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8347189.
5
Health and environmental impacts of increased generation of coal ash and FGD sludges. Report to the Committee on Health and Ecological Effects of Increased Coal Utilization.煤灰和烟气脱硫污泥产量增加对健康和环境的影响。提交给煤炭使用增加对健康和生态影响委员会的报告。
Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Dec;33:131-57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7933131.
6
Health effects of subchronic inhalation exposure to simulated downwind coal combustion emissions.亚慢性吸入模拟下风煤燃烧排放物对健康的影响。
Inhal Toxicol. 2011 May;23(6):349-62. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2011.572932.
7
Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.第2部分。开发增强的统计方法,以评估与多种空气污染物的未知数量主要来源相关的健康影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):51-113.
8
First two months of pregnancy--critical time for preterm delivery and low birthweight caused by adverse effects of coal combustion toxics.妊娠前两个月——因煤炭燃烧毒物的不良影响导致早产和低出生体重的关键时期。
Early Hum Dev. 2004 Nov;80(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.06.001.
9
Sulfur emission from Victorian brown coal under pyrolysis, oxy-fuel combustion and gasification conditions.维多利亚褐煤在热解、富氧燃烧和气化条件下的硫排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Feb 5;47(3):1729-34. doi: 10.1021/es303364g. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
The London low emission zone baseline study.伦敦低排放区基线研究。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Nov(163):3-79.

本文引用的文献

1
THE NASHVILLE AIR POLLUTION STUDY. III. MORBIDITY IN RELATION TO AIR POLLUTION.纳什维尔空气污染研究。III. 发病率与空气污染的关系。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Jan;54(1):85-97. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.1.85.
2
A follow-up of Donora ten years after: methodology and findings.多诺拉十年后的随访:方法与结果
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1961 Feb;51(2):155-64. doi: 10.2105/ajph.51.2.155.
3
Patterns of respiratory illness in Sheffield infant schoolchildren.谢菲尔德市小学生的呼吸道疾病模式
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1967 Jan;21(1):7-16. doi: 10.1136/jech.21.1.7.
4
Arsenic and respiratory cancer in man: an occupational study.人体中的砷与呼吸道癌症:一项职业性研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Jun;42(6):1045-52.
5
Chicago air pollution study. SO2 levels and acute illness in patients with chronic bronchopulmonary disease.芝加哥空气污染研究。慢性支气管肺部疾病患者的二氧化硫水平与急性疾病
Arch Environ Health. 1969 May;18(5):768-76. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1969.10665485.
6
Factors influencing the onset of chronic respiratory disease.影响慢性呼吸道疾病发病的因素。
Br Med J. 1969 Apr 26;2(5651):205-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5651.205.
7
Relationship of symptoms of chronic bronchitis and emphysema to weather and air pollution.慢性支气管炎和肺气肿症状与天气及空气污染的关系。
Arch Environ Health. 1968 Mar;16(3):406-13. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1968.10665079.
8
Air pollution, mortality, and weather. New York City, 1960-1964.空气污染、死亡率与天气。纽约市,1960 - 1964年。
Arch Environ Health. 1971 Mar;22(3):334-43. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1971.10665852.
9
Patterns of respiratory illness in Sheffield junior schoolchildren. A follow-up study.谢菲尔德小学生的呼吸道疾病模式。一项随访研究。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Nov;24(4):223-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.4.223.
10
Air pollution and exacerbations of bronchitis.空气污染与支气管炎病情加重
Thorax. 1970 Sep;25(5):525-39. doi: 10.1136/thx.25.5.525.

气体-气溶胶复合体对健康的影响。提交给煤炭使用增加对健康和生态影响特别委员会的报告。

Health effects of the gas-aerosol complex. Report to Special Committee on Health and Ecological Effects of Increased Coal Utilization.

作者信息

Goldstein B D

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Dec;33:191-202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7933191.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.7933191
PMID:120252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1638097/
Abstract

Combustion products derived from the burning of coal are definitely capable of producing adverse human health effects. No single component of the combustion product mixture is solely responsible. Rather, effects are due to a group of compounds, both gases and aerosols, in the effluents of stationary source combustion processes. Although incompletely defined, the individual components of the gas-aerosol complex appear to be capable of interacting both in terms of atmospheric chemistry and health effects. The three primary air quality standards pertinent to regulating coal combustion all represent to some extent indirect, although reasonable, measures of this gas-aerosol complex. As a group, these standards appear to be adequate to protect human health. Conventional toxicological considerations suggest that the adverse health effects of any necessary increase in coal combustion effluents would be greatest per unit of coal in those areas which are most heavily populated and have the highest preexisting levels of the gas-aerosol complex. In order to decrease the degree of uncertainty for future decisions of this type, it is important that prospective epidemiological and air monitoring studies be initiated in conjunction with any large scale introduction of coal use.

摘要

煤炭燃烧产生的燃烧产物肯定会对人类健康产生不利影响。燃烧产物混合物中没有单一成分对此负全部责任。相反,其影响是由固定源燃烧过程排放物中的一组化合物(包括气体和气溶胶)造成的。尽管尚未完全明确,但气体 - 气溶胶复合物的各个成分似乎在大气化学和健康影响方面都能够相互作用。与煤炭燃烧监管相关的三项主要空气质量标准在某种程度上都代表了对这种气体 - 气溶胶复合物的间接(尽管合理)衡量。总体而言,这些标准似乎足以保护人类健康。传统毒理学考量表明,在人口最密集且气体 - 气溶胶复合物先前水平最高的地区,煤炭燃烧排放物任何必要增加所产生的不利健康影响,按每单位煤炭计算将最为严重。为了降低未来此类决策的不确定性程度,在大规模引入煤炭使用的同时启动前瞻性流行病学和空气监测研究非常重要。