Risberg J, Hope A
Norwegian Underwater Institute and Royal Norwegian Navy, Bergen.
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2001 Fall;28(3):137-43.
Uncontrolled observations from the "technical" diving community claim superior thermal comfort when replacing air with argon as dry suit inflation gas during diving. The objective of the present experiment was to evaluate the effectiveness of argon compared to air during cold water diving. Body weight, urinary output, and rectal and skin temperatures were measured in six naval divers during two dives to approximately 10 m for 60 min. Level of thermal comfort was reported. Dry suit gas was either argon or air, divers and scientists were blinded for gas identity. Urinary output was approximately 200 ml less (P < 0.05) during the air than the argon dives. Rectal and all skin temperatures decreased significantly in both groups during the dive but no difference was measured between argon and air dives. Thermal comfort was not different between the groups. Replacing air with argon neither improves subjective impression of thermal comfort nor attenuates core or skin cooling during cold water diving to 10 meters of sea water for 60 min.
“技术”潜水群体的非对照观察表明,在潜水过程中用氩气替代空气作为干式潜水服的充气气体时,能带来更好的热舒适度。本实验的目的是评估在冷水潜水中氩气相对于空气的有效性。在6名海军潜水员进行两次潜水至约10米深度、持续60分钟的过程中,测量了他们的体重、尿量以及直肠温度和皮肤温度。报告了热舒适度水平。干式潜水服的充气气体为氩气或空气,潜水员和科学家均不知晓气体种类。与氩气潜水相比,空气潜水期间的尿量少约200毫升(P < 0.05)。两组在潜水过程中直肠温度和所有皮肤温度均显著下降,但氩气潜水和空气潜水之间未测得差异。两组之间的热舒适度无差异。在冷水潜水至10米海水深度并持续60分钟的过程中,用氩气替代空气既不能改善热舒适度的主观感受,也不能减弱核心体温或皮肤温度的下降。