Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y
Department of Operative Dentistry, Okayama University Dental School, Japan.
J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jun;29(6):528-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00855.x.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of three types of different adhesive systems on enamel adhesion. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP) as a traditional system, Single Bond (SB) as a wet-bonding system and Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Unifil Bond (UB) as self-etching priming systems were used. Bovine enamel was treated with each system and tensile bond strength (TBS) of resin to the enamel was measured. The conditioned enamel surfaces and resin-enamel interfaces were also morphologically observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM). The mean TBS for MP, SB, SE and UB were 15.3, 13.7, 14.3 and 11.6 MPa, respectively. There was no significant difference in mean TBS among all products but the traditional system showed the most stable TBS. In SEM observations, self-etching primer created a weaker etched pattern on the enamel surface than phosphoric acid. At the resin-enamel interfaces, thick tag-like extensions penetrated into the enamel etched with phosphoric acid regardless of using the wet-bonding technique, while self-etching primer created thin lamina-like resin penetrations. These results indicate that the traditional system with phosphoric acid etching exhibits the most stable enamel adhesion although the enamel-bonding promoting abilities of these adhesive systems are equivalent to each other.
本研究的目的是评估三种不同粘接系统对牙釉质粘接的影响。使用Scotchbond多功能(MP)作为传统系统,单组分粘接剂(SB)作为湿粘接系统,以及Clearfil SE Bond(SE)和Unifil Bond(UB)作为自酸蚀底漆系统。用每种系统处理牛牙釉质,并测量树脂与牙釉质之间的拉伸粘接强度(TBS)。还用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对处理后的牙釉质表面和树脂-牙釉质界面进行了形态学观察。MP、SB、SE和UB的平均TBS分别为15.3、13.7、14.3和11.6MPa。所有产品的平均TBS之间没有显著差异,但传统系统显示出最稳定的TBS。在SEM观察中,自酸蚀底漆在牙釉质表面产生的蚀刻图案比磷酸弱。在树脂-牙釉质界面处,无论使用湿粘接技术如何,厚的标签状延伸物都会穿透用磷酸蚀刻的牙釉质,而自酸蚀底漆则产生薄的层状树脂渗透。这些结果表明,尽管这些粘接系统促进牙釉质粘接的能力彼此相当,但采用磷酸蚀刻的传统系统表现出最稳定的牙釉质粘接。