• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

固定保持器的反复粘结会增加牙釉质骨折的风险。

Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

作者信息

Chinvipas Netrporn, Hasegawa Yuh, Terada Kazuto

机构信息

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, The Nippon Dental University Graduate School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8 Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8580, Japan.

出版信息

Odontology. 2014 Jan;102(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9
PMID:23239387
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of repeated bonding, using 2 different orthodontic adhesive systems, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the enamel surface morphology. Sixty premolars were divided into 2 groups (n = 30), and either Transbond XT (T group) or Fuji Ortho LC (F group) adhesives were used. SBS was measured 24 h after bonding, using a universal testing machine. Then, the enamel surfaces were investigated and the mode of failure was described using adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. After each debonding, 10 teeth from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the penetration of adhesives, the length of resin tags, and the state of the enamel surface. The other teeth were subjected to two more bonding/debonding procedures. In T group, the second debonding sequences had significantly higher bond strengths than the other sequences. The length of resin tags was greatest in the second debonding sequence, although there was no significant difference. In F group, the SBS increased with further rebonding and the failure mode tended towards cohesive failure. In both groups, the ARI scores increased with rebonding. Enamel loss could have occurred with both adhesives, although the surfaces appeared unchanged to the naked eye. From this study, we suggest that enamel damage caused by repeated bonding is of concern. To prevent bond failure, we should pay attention to the adhesion method used for bondable retainers.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查使用两种不同正畸粘接系统进行反复粘接对剪切粘接强度(SBS)和牙釉质表面形态的影响。60颗前磨牙被分为两组(n = 30),分别使用Transbond XT(T组)或Fuji Ortho LC(F组)粘接剂。粘接24小时后,使用万能试验机测量SBS。然后,对牙釉质表面进行检查,并使用粘接剂残留指数(ARI)评分描述失败模式。每次脱粘后,每组选取10颗牙齿通过扫描电子显微镜检查,以确定粘接剂的渗透情况、树脂突的长度和牙釉质表面的状态。其他牙齿再进行两次粘接/脱粘操作。在T组中,第二次脱粘序列的粘接强度明显高于其他序列。尽管没有显著差异,但树脂突的长度在第二次脱粘序列中最大。在F组中,SBS随着再次粘接而增加,失败模式倾向于内聚破坏。在两组中,ARI评分均随着再次粘接而增加。两种粘接剂都可能导致牙釉质损失,尽管肉眼观察表面没有变化。从本研究中,我们认为反复粘接引起的牙釉质损伤值得关注。为防止粘接失败,我们应注意可粘接保持器所使用的粘接方法。

相似文献

1
Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.固定保持器的反复粘结会增加牙釉质骨折的风险。
Odontology. 2014 Jan;102(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
2
Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.传统树脂黏合剂与树脂改性玻璃离子黏合剂之间黏结强度的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.013.
3
The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.重复粘结对不同正畸粘结剂剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 May;121(5):521-5. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.123042.
4
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.使用不同自酸蚀粘接剂粘接的正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024.
5
Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.三种粘结剂的粘结强度比较:复合树脂、混合型玻璃离子水门汀和玻璃填充型玻璃离子水门汀。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):36-42. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.110519.
6
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
7
Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.黏接式正畸保持器与牙釉质的黏附性能:不锈钢丝与纤维增强复合材料的比较。
J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):381-90.
8
A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.新一代自酸蚀粘结剂:与传统酸蚀技术的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Mar;69(2):78-93. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0709-6.
9
Evaluation of enamel loss by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets place with four different adhesives.扫描电镜评价四种不同黏结剂去带托槽后釉质的损耗。
Microsc Res Tech. 2021 May;84(5):912-920. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23652. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use.用于正畸的不同比例硅烷涂层二氧化硅的 Bis-GMA/TEGDMA 树脂的制备和评价。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):62-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq159. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT) in retainer removal : Effects on enamel loss, composite residue, and time.保持器去除中的荧光辅助识别技术(FIT):对牙釉质损失、复合树脂残留及时间的影响
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00606-w.
2
Impact of bonding protocols and physical-mechanical properties of composite on durability and failure rate of fixed orthodontic retainers: a systematic review of laboratory studies.粘结方案及复合材料的物理机械性能对固定正畸保持器耐久性和失败率的影响:实验室研究的系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06635-6.
3
Comparative evaluation of bonding failure rate with two light cure orthodontic adhesives: a cross-arch split-mouth prospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials.美学修复材料的剪切粘结强度比较
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jan;3(1):22-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.94541.
2
A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival.下颌舌侧保持器存留的前瞻性临床评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):470-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr038. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
3
Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding.脉冲去带与传统去带的比较。
两种光固化正畸粘合剂粘结失败率的比较评估:一项跨牙弓分口前瞻性研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 May 23;30(2):e2524214. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524214.oar. eCollection 2025.
4
Finite Element Analysis of Fixed Orthodontic Retainers.固定正畸保持器的有限元分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;11(4):394. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040394.
5
Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.六种不同的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)固位体与不锈钢丝圈式固位体的比较:一项关于生存率和稳定性的体外研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar;86(2):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00486-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.体内评估传统扭簧和各种固定正畸 CAD/CAM 保持器引起的 MRI 图像伪影。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jul;85(4):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00445-z. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
7
Clinical bracket failure rates between different bonding techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同粘结技术之间的临床托槽脱落率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Mar 31;45(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac050.
8
Bruxism's Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion.磨牙症对固定正畸保持器黏附的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 1;10(8):141. doi: 10.3390/dj10080141.
9
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.评价固定正畸 CAD/CAM 保持器引起的磁共振成像伪影:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03450-x. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Fixed Orthodontic Retainers: A Review.固定正畸保持器:综述
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Jun;32(2):110-114. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18080. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1036-44. doi: 10.2319/033110-48.1.
4
Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations.粘结式正畸保持器:不同钢丝与复合材料组合的初始粘结强度比较
J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Jul;71(4):290-9. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-9947-5. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
5
Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.使用三种不同粘结系统评估正畸托槽的脱粘强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Dec;29(6):571-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm056. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
6
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems.对暴露于3种正畸粘结系统的牙釉质表面进行扫描电子显微镜评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Nov;130(5):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.002.
7
A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand.对澳大利亚和新西兰留存程序的全面调查。
Aust Orthod J. 2004 Nov;20(2):99-106.
8
A 12 month clinical study of bond failures of recycled versus new stainless steel orthodontic brackets.一项关于回收与全新不锈钢正畸托槽粘结失败情况的12个月临床研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Aug;26(4):449-54. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.4.449.
9
Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.传统树脂黏合剂与树脂改性玻璃离子黏合剂之间黏结强度的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.013.
10
Assessing the performance of a methyl methacrylate-based resin cement with self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.评估一种基于甲基丙烯酸甲酯的树脂水门汀与自酸蚀底漆用于粘结正畸托槽的性能。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):702-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0702:ATPOAM>2.0.CO;2.