Suppr超能文献

固定保持器的反复粘结会增加牙釉质骨折的风险。

Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

作者信息

Chinvipas Netrporn, Hasegawa Yuh, Terada Kazuto

机构信息

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, The Nippon Dental University Graduate School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8 Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8580, Japan.

出版信息

Odontology. 2014 Jan;102(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of repeated bonding, using 2 different orthodontic adhesive systems, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the enamel surface morphology. Sixty premolars were divided into 2 groups (n = 30), and either Transbond XT (T group) or Fuji Ortho LC (F group) adhesives were used. SBS was measured 24 h after bonding, using a universal testing machine. Then, the enamel surfaces were investigated and the mode of failure was described using adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. After each debonding, 10 teeth from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the penetration of adhesives, the length of resin tags, and the state of the enamel surface. The other teeth were subjected to two more bonding/debonding procedures. In T group, the second debonding sequences had significantly higher bond strengths than the other sequences. The length of resin tags was greatest in the second debonding sequence, although there was no significant difference. In F group, the SBS increased with further rebonding and the failure mode tended towards cohesive failure. In both groups, the ARI scores increased with rebonding. Enamel loss could have occurred with both adhesives, although the surfaces appeared unchanged to the naked eye. From this study, we suggest that enamel damage caused by repeated bonding is of concern. To prevent bond failure, we should pay attention to the adhesion method used for bondable retainers.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查使用两种不同正畸粘接系统进行反复粘接对剪切粘接强度(SBS)和牙釉质表面形态的影响。60颗前磨牙被分为两组(n = 30),分别使用Transbond XT(T组)或Fuji Ortho LC(F组)粘接剂。粘接24小时后,使用万能试验机测量SBS。然后,对牙釉质表面进行检查,并使用粘接剂残留指数(ARI)评分描述失败模式。每次脱粘后,每组选取10颗牙齿通过扫描电子显微镜检查,以确定粘接剂的渗透情况、树脂突的长度和牙釉质表面的状态。其他牙齿再进行两次粘接/脱粘操作。在T组中,第二次脱粘序列的粘接强度明显高于其他序列。尽管没有显著差异,但树脂突的长度在第二次脱粘序列中最大。在F组中,SBS随着再次粘接而增加,失败模式倾向于内聚破坏。在两组中,ARI评分均随着再次粘接而增加。两种粘接剂都可能导致牙釉质损失,尽管肉眼观察表面没有变化。从本研究中,我们认为反复粘接引起的牙釉质损伤值得关注。为防止粘接失败,我们应注意可粘接保持器所使用的粘接方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验