Suppr超能文献

预防与医疗保健中的公平性。

Equity in prevention and health care.

作者信息

Lorant V, Boland B, Humblet P, Deliège D

机构信息

Health Sociology and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):510-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.7.510.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

There is an increasing body of evidence about socioeconomic inequality in preventive use, mostly for cancer screening. But as far as needs of prevention are unequally distributed, even equal use may not be fair. Moreover, prevention might be unequally used in the same way as health care in general. The objective of the paper is to assess inequity in prevention and to compare socioeconomic inequity in preventive medicine with that in health care.

DESIGN

A cross sectional Health Interview Survey was carried out in 1997 by face to face interview and self administered questionnaire. Two types of health care utilisation were considered (contacts with GPs and with specialists) and four preventive care mostly delivered in a GP setting (flu vaccination, cholesterol screening) or in a specialty setting (mammography and pap smear).

SETTING

Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

A representative sample of 7378 residents aged 25 years and over (participation rate: 61%).

OUTCOME MEASURE

Socioeconomic inequity was measured by the HI(wvp) index, which is the difference between use inequality and needs inequality. Needs was computed as the expected use by the risk factors or target groups.

MAIN RESULTS

There was significant inequity for all medical contacts and preventive medicine. Medical contacts showed inequity favouring the rich for specialist visits and inequity favouring the poor for contacts with GPs. Regarding preventive medicine, inequity was high and favoured the rich for mammography and cervical screening; inequity was lower for flu immunisation and cholesterol screening but still favoured the higher socioeconomic groups. In the general practice setting, inequity in prevention was higher than inequity in health care; in the specialty setting, inequity in prevention was not statistically different from inequity in health care, although it was higher than in the general practice setting.

CONCLUSIONS

If inequity in preventive medicine is to be lowered, the role of the GP must be fostered and access to specialty medicine increased, especially for cancer screening.

摘要

研究目的

关于预防性医疗使用方面社会经济不平等的证据越来越多,主要涉及癌症筛查。但鉴于预防需求分布不均,即便使用情况相同也可能不公平。此外,预防措施的使用方式可能与总体医疗保健一样存在不平等。本文的目的是评估预防方面的不公平现象,并比较预防医学与医疗保健领域的社会经济不平等情况。

设计

1997年通过面对面访谈和自填问卷开展了一项横断面健康访谈调查。考虑了两种类型的医疗保健利用情况(与全科医生和专科医生的接触)以及四种主要在全科医生诊所(流感疫苗接种、胆固醇筛查)或专科诊所(乳房X光检查和巴氏涂片检查)提供的预防保健服务。

背景

比利时。

参与者

7378名25岁及以上居民的代表性样本(参与率:61%)。

观察指标

社会经济不平等通过HI(wvp)指数衡量,该指数是使用不平等与需求不平等之间的差值。需求根据风险因素或目标群体的预期使用情况计算得出。

主要结果

所有医疗接触和预防医学均存在显著的不公平现象。医疗接触方面,专科就诊存在有利于富人的不公平现象,而与全科医生接触则存在有利于穷人的不公平现象。在预防医学方面,不公平现象严重,乳房X光检查和宫颈癌筛查有利于富人;流感免疫接种和胆固醇筛查的不公平现象较低,但仍有利于社会经济地位较高的群体。在全科医疗环境中,预防方面的不公平高于医疗保健方面的不公平;在专科医疗环境中,预防方面的不公平与医疗保健方面的不公平在统计学上无差异,尽管高于全科医疗环境中的不公平。

结论

若要降低预防医学中的不公平现象,必须加强全科医生的作用并增加专科医疗服务的可及性,尤其是癌症筛查服务。

相似文献

1
Equity in prevention and health care.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):510-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.7.510.
6
Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Jun;15(5):531-41. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.531.
7
Screening for cervical and breast cancer: is obesity an unrecognized barrier to preventive care?
Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 2;132(9):697-704. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-9-200005020-00003.
8
Are smokers less likely to seek preventive healthcare measures in Italy?
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Sep;27(5):507-513. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000357.
10
Depressive symptom burden as a barrier to screening for breast and cervical cancers.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Jul-Aug;13(6):731-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.731.

引用本文的文献

1
Web and/or MD?: Empirically testing the relationships between internet use and visits to healthcare professionals.
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Jul;376:118071. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118071. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach.
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1.
3
Dynamic Price Application to Prevent Financial Losses to Hospitals Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;12(13):1272. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131272.
4
Inpatient healthcare utilization among people with disabilities in Iran: determinants and inequality patterns.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 11;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10383-0.
5
Cervical cancer screening pathways in France in 2015-2021, a nationwide study based on medico-administrative data.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 28;36:102429. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102429. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Oct;8(4):337-348. doi: 10.1177/23800844221118515. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

2
Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US.
J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):553-83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00050-3.
4
Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study.
BMJ. 2000 Apr 1;320(7239):909-13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7239.909.
5
"It's just part of being a woman": cervical screening, the body and femininity.
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Feb;50(3):429-44. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00316-0.
6
Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00057-4.
7
Mental disorders and referrals to mental health specialists by general practitioners.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;34(3):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s001270050123.
8
Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship.
J Health Econ. 1998 Oct;17(5):587-605. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00035-0.
9
Equity and equality in health and health care.
J Health Econ. 1993 Dec;12(4):431-57. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90004-x.
10
Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons.
J Health Econ. 1992 Dec;11(4):389-411. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90013-q.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验