Grace Randolph C, Bedell Melissa A, Nevin John A
University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):233-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-233.
Pigeons responded in a three-component multiple concurrent-chains procedure in which the variable-interval reinforcement schedules were the same across components but magnitudes differed across components. The terminal links were arranged either as a variable delay followed by presentation of a reinforcer ("variable duration") or as a fixed period of access to the schedule during which a variable number of reinforcers could be earned ("constant duration"). Relative reinforcement rate was varied parametrically across both types of conditions. After baseline training in each condition, resistance to change of terminal-link responding was assessed by delivering food during the initial links according to a variable-time schedule. Both preference and resistance to change were more sensitive to reinforcement-rate differences in the constant-duration conditions. Sensitivities of preference and resistance to change to relative reinforcement rate did not change depending on relative reinforcement magnitude. Taken together, these results confirm and extend those of prior studies, and suggest that reinforcement rate and magnitude combine additively to determine preference and resistance to change. A single structural relation linking preference and resistance to change describes all the data from this and several related studies.
鸽子在一个三成分多重并发链程序中做出反应,其中各成分间的可变间隔强化程序相同,但强化量在各成分间有所不同。终端环节要么安排为可变延迟后呈现强化物(“可变时长”),要么安排为可获得一定数量强化物的固定时长(“固定时长”)。相对强化率在两种条件下均进行参数化变化。在每种条件下进行基线训练后,通过按照可变时程在初始环节提供食物来评估终端环节反应的变化抗性。在固定时长条件下,偏好和变化抗性对强化率差异都更敏感。偏好和变化抗性对相对强化率的敏感性并不取决于相对强化量。综合来看,这些结果证实并扩展了先前研究的结果,并表明强化率和强化量相加共同决定偏好和变化抗性。一个将偏好和变化抗性联系起来的单一结构关系描述了本研究及几项相关研究的所有数据。