Lance Charles E, Noble Carrie L, Scullen Steven E
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA.
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):228-44. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.228.
The correlated trait-correlated method (CT-CM) and correlated uniqueness (CU) confirmatory factor analysis models for multitrait-multimethod data are critiqued. Although the CU model often returns convergent and admissible factor solutions when the CT-CM model does not, the CU model is shown to have theoretical and substantive shortcomings. On the basis of this critique, the authors recommend that the CT-CM model be regarded as the generally preferred model and that the CU model be invoked only when the CT-CM model fails.
针对多特质-多方法数据的相关特质-相关方法(CT-CM)和相关独特性(CU)验证性因素分析模型受到了批评。尽管当CT-CM模型无法得出收敛且可接受的因素解时,CU模型常常能够得出,但CU模型在理论和实质上存在缺陷。基于这一批评,作者建议将CT-CM模型视为普遍更优的模型,只有在CT-CM模型失败时才调用CU模型。