• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术后,可吸收网状缝线引起的慢性疼痛是否比不可吸收缝线少?

Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy?

作者信息

Paajanen Hannu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Hernia. 2002 Mar;6(1):26-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0048-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-002-0048-2
PMID:12090577
Abstract

Chronic inguinal pain occurs in 20-30% of patients after hernia surgery. A prospective randomized study of 162 patients was undertaken to determine whether absorbable sutures cause less pain than continuous polypropylene fixation of the mesh in the Lichtenstein operation. All patients were operated on under local anesthesia by the same senior surgeon. One-half of the meshes were fixed with continuous 2-0 Dexon II sutures and one-half with continuous 2-0 Prolene sutures. The incidence of pain and recurrence was investigated after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Patient characteristics and operative outcome were similar in the two groups and statistically nonsignificant in both. The rate of significant wound hematomas (n = 3), infections (n = 1), and recurrences (n = 2) were low and not related to the type of sutures. In both study groups 24-26% of the patients felt some pain in follow-up, but over 90% were very satisfied with the operation. The absorbable suture material does not appear to cause less neuropathic pain after Lichtenstein operation than nonabsorbable sutures.

摘要

疝气手术后,20%至30%的患者会出现慢性腹股沟疼痛。一项针对162名患者的前瞻性随机研究旨在确定在Lichtenstein手术中,可吸收缝线是否比连续聚丙烯固定补片引起的疼痛更少。所有患者均由同一位资深外科医生在局部麻醉下进行手术。一半的补片用连续的2-0 Dexon II缝线固定,另一半用连续的2-0 Prolene缝线固定。平均随访2年后,对疼痛和复发的发生率进行了调查。两组患者的特征和手术结果相似,且在统计学上均无显著差异。严重伤口血肿(n = 3)、感染(n = 1)和复发(n = 2)的发生率较低,且与缝线类型无关。在两个研究组中,24%至26%的患者在随访中感到有些疼痛,但超过90%的患者对手术非常满意。与不可吸收缝线相比,可吸收缝合材料在Lichtenstein手术后似乎不会引起更少的神经性疼痛。

相似文献

1
Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy?在Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术后,可吸收网状缝线引起的慢性疼痛是否比不可吸收缝线少?
Hernia. 2002 Mar;6(1):26-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0048-2.
2
Randomized clinical trial of tissue glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in local anaesthetic Lichtenstein hernia repair.随机临床试验:组织胶水与可吸收缝线在局部麻醉下 Lichtenstein 疝修补术中用于网片固定的比较。
Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7598. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
3
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Suture Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: 7-Year Outcome Analysis.比较氰基丙烯酸酯胶水与缝线固定用于李金斯坦疝修补术的随机临床试验:7年结果分析
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):108-113. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3801-x.
4
Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.采用可吸收缝线的无张力腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛减轻:一项单盲随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
5
[Prospective randomized trial of long-term results of inguinal hernia repair using autoadhesive mesh compared to classic Lichtenstein technique with sutures and polypropylene mesh].[使用自粘性补片与经典的带缝线聚丙烯补片的利希滕斯坦技术相比进行腹股沟疝修补术长期结果的前瞻性随机试验]
Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
6
Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Glue Fixation, Self-gripping Mesh, and Suture Fixation of Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair (FinnMesh Study).比较胶水固定、自固定补片和补片缝合固定用于Lichtenstein疝修补术的随机多中心试验(芬兰补片研究)
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):714-9; discussion 719-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001458.
7
Comparison of Postoperative Chronic Groin Pain After Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Mesh Fixation.使用不可吸收缝线与可吸收缝线固定补片修复腹股沟疝后慢性腹股沟疼痛的比较。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 27;15(2):e35562. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35562. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy under local infiltration anaesthesia as rapid outpatient procedure.局部浸润麻醉下的利氏腹股沟疝修补术作为快速门诊手术
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 2001(215):51-4.
9
Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study).开放腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的预测因素:一项随机试验的回归分析,该试验比较了三种不同补片与三种固定方法(芬兰补片研究)
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):813-818. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1772-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Polypropylene suture versus skin staples for securing mesh in lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.聚丙烯缝线与皮肤吻合钉在利氏腹股沟疝修补术中固定补片的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Feb;24(2):88-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Mesh and Fixation on Chronic Inguinal Pain in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: 5-Year Outcomes from the Finn Mesh Study.Lichtenstein 疝修补术中补片和固定对慢性腹股沟疼痛的影响:芬兰补片研究的 5 年结果。
World J Surg. 2021 Feb;45(2):459-464. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05835-1. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study).开放腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的预测因素:一项随机试验的回归分析,该试验比较了三种不同补片与三种固定方法(芬兰补片研究)
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):813-818. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1772-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials assessing mesh fixation with glue versus suture in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
一项关于在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中评估用胶水与缝线进行补片固定的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0227. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010227.
4
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Progrip self-gripping mesh in Rives-Stoppa repair: Are there any differences in outcomes versus a retromuscular polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures? A "case series" study.里夫斯-斯托帕修补术中使用的Progrip自固定网片:与用缝线固定的肌后聚丙烯网片相比,其治疗效果是否存在差异?一项“病例系列”研究。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;34:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
7
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Suture Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: 7-Year Outcome Analysis.比较氰基丙烯酸酯胶水与缝线固定用于李金斯坦疝修补术的随机临床试验:7年结果分析
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):108-113. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3801-x.
8
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Fibrin Glue Versus Prolene Suture for Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair.一项比较纤维蛋白胶与普理灵缝线在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中用于补片固定的前瞻性随机研究。
Indian J Surg. 2016 Aug;78(4):288-92. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1371-z. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
9
Randomised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.随机临床试验:双侧腹股沟疝手术中传统利chtenstein修补术与自粘补片疝修补术的对比
Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):765-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1316-7. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Effectiveness and safety of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate medical adhesive for noninvasive patch fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补中非植入式修补片固定中的有效性和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2970-z. Epub 2013 May 10.