• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生-护士患者护理团队对学术性急诊科患者满意度的影响。

The effects of a physician-nurse patient care team on patient satisfaction in an academic ED.

作者信息

Debehnke Daniel, Decker M Chris

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):267-70. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34199.

DOI:10.1053/ajem.2002.34199
PMID:12098169
Abstract

The objectives were to investigate the effects of a RN/MD patient care team operational change on ED patient satisfaction. In period 1, RNs had standard room assignments and MDs evaluated patients based upon physician availability and perceived patient load. In period 2, RNs and MDs were organized into 2 patient care "teams" and patients were assigned to teams on an alternating basis. Patient satisfaction was rated using the standard ED Press, Ganey survey instrument. A total of 508 surveys were returned in period 1 and 454 in period 2. From period 1 to 2, overall ED patient satisfaction improved from 78.2 +/- 20.4% to 82.2 +/- 17.2% (improvement from 23rd to 59th percentile, P <or=.01). Patient satisfaction with waiting time to treatment area improved from the 33rd to 52nd percentile (73.6 +/- 30.0% v 77.4 +/- 27.0%, P <or=.05). Satisfaction with waiting time to see the physician also improved from the 25th to the 62nd percentile (67.6 +/- 32.2% v 73.4 +/- 28.5%, P <or=.01). Patients feelings that staff cared about them as a person improved from the 20th to the 65th percentile (77.3 +/- 28.3% v 83.0 +/- 22.4%, P <or=.01) Patients were more likely to recommend the ED following the operational change, improving from the 26th to 69th percentile (75.8 +/- 32.7% v 82.83 +/- 25.3%, P <or=.01). ED patient care using a RN/MD patient care team improved patients' overall waiting time and length of stay satisfaction and improved the patients' satisfaction with staff and their likelihood of recommending the ED to others.

摘要

研究目的是调查注册护士/医生患者护理团队运营变革对急诊科患者满意度的影响。在第1阶段,注册护士有标准的病房分配,医生根据自身可利用时间和感知到的患者负荷来评估患者。在第2阶段,注册护士和医生被组织成2个患者护理“团队”,患者交替分配到各个团队。使用标准的急诊科Press、Ganey调查问卷工具对患者满意度进行评分。第1阶段共收回508份调查问卷,第2阶段收回454份。从第1阶段到第2阶段,急诊科患者总体满意度从78.2±20.4%提高到82.2±17.2%(从第23百分位提高到第59百分位,P≤0.01)。患者对等待进入治疗区域时间的满意度从第33百分位提高到第52百分位(73.6±30.0%对77.4±27.0%,P≤0.05)。对等待看医生时间的满意度也从第25百分位提高到第62百分位(67.6±32.2%对73.4±28.5%,P≤0.01)。患者感觉工作人员关心他们个人的情况从第20百分位提高到第65百分位(77.3±28.3%对83.0±22.4%,P≤0.01)。运营变革后患者更有可能推荐该急诊科,从第26百分位提高到第69百分位(75.8±32.7%对82.83±25.3%,P≤0.01)。采用注册护士/医生患者护理团队的急诊科患者护理提高了患者总体等待时间和住院时间满意度,改善了患者对工作人员的满意度以及他们向他人推荐该急诊科的可能性。

相似文献

1
The effects of a physician-nurse patient care team on patient satisfaction in an academic ED.医生-护士患者护理团队对学术性急诊科患者满意度的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):267-70. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34199.
2
Team assignment system: expediting emergency department care.团队分配系统:加快急诊科护理速度。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
3
The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department.出院后患者电话随访对学术型急诊科患者推荐意愿的影响
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.067. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
4
Avoiding prolonged waiting time during busy periods in the emergency department: Is there a role for the senior emergency physician in triage?避免急诊科繁忙时段的长时间等待: senior emergency physician 在分诊中能发挥作用吗? (注:这里“senior emergency physician”可能有误,推测为“senior emergency physician”,准确的可能是“资深急诊科医生”等类似表述 )
Eur J Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;13(6):342-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mej.0000224425.36444.50.
5
Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay.医疗团队评估:对急诊科候诊时间和住院时间的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372. eCollection 2016.
6
Effect of an emergency department fast track on Press-Ganey patient satisfaction scores.急诊科快速通道对Press-Ganey患者满意度评分的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):34-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.21768. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
Making an IMPACT on emergency department flow: improving patient processing assisted by consultant at triage.对急诊科流程产生影响:在分诊时由顾问协助改善患者处理流程。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):537-41. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003913.
8
Application of statistical process control to physician-specific emergency department patient satisfaction scores: a novel use of the funnel plot.应用统计过程控制对医师特定急诊患者满意度评分的分析:漏斗图的新用途。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01304.x.
9
Prospective, double-blind, comparative fast-tracking trial in an academic emergency department during a period of limited resources.在资源有限时期于一所学术性急诊科开展的前瞻性、双盲、比较性快速通道试验。
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):403-6.
10
Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department.通过改善儿科急诊科的沟通质量来优化患者/护理人员满意度。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1016-21. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235be06.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of interprofessional teamwork modules implementation in an emergency department - A mixed-methods case study of implementation fidelity.评价急诊科跨专业团队合作模块的实施情况——一项关于实施一致性的混合方法案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06822-5.
2
Can dedicated emergency team and area for older people reduce the hospital admission rate? - An observational pre- and post-intervention study.专门的老年人急救小组和区域能否降低住院率?——一项观察性干预前后研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02044-w.
3
Defining "Swarming" as a New Model to Optimize Efficiency and Education in an Academic Emergency Department.
将“蜂群模式”定义为优化学术急诊科效率与教育的新模式。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Sep 12;4(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10388. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
Team-Based Care and Patient Satisfaction in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.医院环境中的团队式护理与患者满意度:一项系统综述。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019 Apr 29;6(2):158-171. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1695. eCollection 2019 Spring.
5
Interprofessional teamwork versus fast track streaming in an emergency department-An observational cohort study of two strategies for enhancing the throughput of orthopedic patients presenting limb injuries or back pain.多专业团队协作与急诊快速通道分流策略对提高骨科四肢损伤和腰背疼痛患者就诊流程效率的观察性队列研究
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0220011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220011. eCollection 2019.
6
What Can We Do to Improve Patient Satisfactıon in the Emergency Department? A Prospective Study in a Turkish University Hospital.我们能做些什么来提高急诊科患者的满意度?土耳其一家大学医院的前瞻性研究。
Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 15;2(4):e41. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.94. eCollection 2018 Fall.
7
Can interprofessional teamwork reduce patient throughput times? A longitudinal single-centre study of three different triage processes at a Swedish emergency department.跨专业团队合作能否缩短患者就诊流程时间?一项针对瑞典急诊科三种不同分诊流程的纵向单中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 19;8(4):e019744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019744.
8
'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles.“谁在你的医疗团队中?”询问心力衰竭患者关于护理团队的成员和职责。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):198-210. doi: 10.1111/hex.12447. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
The Impact of Medical Student Participation in Emergency Medicine Patient Care on Departmental Press Ganey Scores.医学生参与急诊医学患者护理对科室Press Ganey评分的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):830-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27321. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Can team-based care improve patient satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.基于团队的护理能否提高患者满意度?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e100603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100603. eCollection 2014.