Liu Jenny, Masiello Italo, Ponzer Sari, Farrokhnia Nasim
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 19;8(4):e019744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019744.
To determine the impact on emergency department (ED) throughput times and proportion of patients who leave without being seen by a physician (LWBS) of two triage interventions, where comprehensive nurse-led triage was first replaced by senior physician-led triage and then by interprofessional teamwork.
Single-centre before-and-after study.
Adult ED of a Swedish urban hospital.
Patients arriving on weekdays 08:00 to 21:00 during three 1-year periods in the interval May 2012 to November 2015. A total of 185 806 arrivals were included.
Senior physicians replaced triage nurses May 2013 to May 2014. Interprofessional teamwork replaced the triage process on weekdays 08:00 to 21:00 November 2014 to November 2015.
Primary outcomes were the median time to physician (TTP) and the median length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome was the LWBS rate.
The crude median LOS was shortest for teamwork, 228 min (95% CI 226.4 to 230.5) compared with 232 min (95% CI 230.8 to 233.9) for nurse-led and 250 min (95% CI 248.5 to 252.6) for physician-led triage. The adjusted LOS for the teamwork period was 16 min shorter than for nurse-led triage and 23 min shorter than for physician-led triage. The median TTP was shortest for physician-led triage, 56 min (95% CI 54.5 to 56.6) compared with 116 min (95% CI 114.4 to 117.5) for nurse-led triage and 74 min (95% CI 72.7 to 74.8) for teamwork. The LWBS rate was 1.9% for nurse-led triage, 1.2% for physician-led triage and 3.2% for teamwork. All outcome measure differences had two-tailed p values<0.01.
Interprofessional teamwork had the shortest length of stay, a shorter time to physician than nurse-led triage, but a higher LWBS rate. Interprofessional teamwork may be a useful approach to reducing ED throughput times.
确定两种分诊干预措施对急诊科(ED)周转时间以及未就诊即离开(LWBS)患者比例的影响,其中综合护士主导的分诊首先被高级医师主导的分诊所取代,然后又被跨专业团队协作所取代。
单中心前后对照研究。
瑞典一家城市医院的成人急诊科。
2012年5月至2015年11月期间三个1年时间段内工作日8:00至21:00到达的患者。共纳入185806名就诊者。
2013年5月至2014年5月,高级医师取代分诊护士。2014年11月至2015年11月,跨专业团队协作在工作日8:00至21:00取代了分诊流程。
主要结局为中位医师接诊时间(TTP)和中位住院时间(LOS)。次要结局为LWBS率。
团队协作模式下的粗中位LOS最短,为228分钟(95%CI 226.4至230.5),而护士主导模式下为232分钟(95%CI 230.8至233.9),医师主导模式下为250分钟(95%CI 248.5至252.6)。团队协作时间段调整后的LOS比护士主导模式短16分钟,比医师主导模式短23分钟。中位TTP在医师主导模式下最短,为56分钟(95%CI 54.5至56.6),护士主导模式下为116分钟(95%CI 114.4至117.5),团队协作模式下为74分钟(95%CI 72.7至74.8)。LWBS率在护士主导模式下为1.9%,医师主导模式下为1.2%,团队协作模式下为3.2%。所有结局指标差异的双侧p值均<0.01。
跨专业团队协作的住院时间最短,医师接诊时间比护士主导模式短,但LWBS率更高。跨专业团队协作可能是减少急诊科周转时间的一种有效方法。