• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

满足残疾人的医疗保健需求。

Meeting the health care needs of persons with disabilities.

作者信息

Clancy Carolyn M, Andresen Elena M

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Saint Louis University, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):381-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00008.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00008
PMID:12101877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2690111/
Abstract

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has established the Office of Priority Populations Research and is currently developing a research agenda to improve health care for persons with disability (PWDs). This article describes the background of and potential for the AHRQ disability agenda and some of the challenges ahead and considers future directions for disability-related health services research. Strategies for this agenda might include ensuring the inclusion of PWDs in current and future health care research studies and database development; support for studies and data focusing exclusively on PWDs; and support for studies of the challenges common to all or most of the priority populations.

摘要

医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)设立了优先人群研究办公室,目前正在制定一项研究议程,以改善残疾人士的医疗保健服务。本文介绍了AHRQ残疾议程的背景和潜力、面临的一些挑战,并探讨了与残疾相关的卫生服务研究的未来方向。该议程的策略可能包括确保在当前和未来的医疗保健研究及数据库开发中纳入残疾人士;支持专门针对残疾人士的研究和数据;以及支持对所有或大多数优先人群共有的挑战进行研究。

相似文献

1
Meeting the health care needs of persons with disabilities.满足残疾人的医疗保健需求。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):381-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00008.
2
The first national reports on United States healthcare quality and disparities.首份关于美国医疗保健质量与差异的全国性报告。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):316-21. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200410000-00005.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Creating capacity: establishing a health education research agenda for special populations.创造能力:为特殊人群建立健康教育研究议程。
Health Educ Q. 1995 Aug;22(3):390-405. doi: 10.1177/109019819402200309.
5
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
6
Improving health care quality and safety for people with disabilities: an interview with Lisa Iezzoni. Interview by Steven Berman.提高残疾人的医疗保健质量与安全:对丽莎·耶佐尼的访谈。史蒂文·伯曼采访
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Jul;32(7):400-6, 357.
7
Managed care and people with disabilities: framing the issues.管理式医疗与残疾人:界定相关问题。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Oct;79(10):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90283-0.
8
[The Evaluation of the German Federal Law of Equal Treatment of Disabled Persons].[德国联邦残疾人平等待遇法评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Aug;79(8-09):e56-e61. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108577. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework.残疾与医疗保健差距的交叉点:一个概念框架。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):632-41. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.938176. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
10
Human resources for health (and rehabilitation): Six Rehab-Workforce Challenges for the century.卫生(及康复)人力资源:本世纪康复劳动力面临的六大挑战。
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Jan 23;15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0182-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges to accessing gynecological care for women with disabilities in Almaty, Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦阿拉木图残疾妇女获得妇科护理面临的挑战。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 May 2;5(2):100502. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100502. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Pediatrician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to discharge instruction comprehension and adherence for parents of children with medical complexity.儿科医生对有医疗复杂性的儿童的父母在理解和遵守出院指导方面的障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Apr;19(4):278-286. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13319. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Disability-friendly healthcare at public health facilities in Bangladesh: a mixed-method study to explore the existing situation.孟加拉国公共卫生设施中的无障碍医疗保健:一项探索现状的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08538-6.
4
Traditional Korean Medicine Usage and Perception: a comparative study between the general population and the disabilities.传统韩医学的使用与认知:普通人群与残疾人群的比较研究
J Pharmacopuncture. 2022 Mar 31;25(1):24-36. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2022.25.1.24.
5
Interfacility Transfers Among Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions.患有复杂慢性病患者之间的机构间转运
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Feb;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0105.
6
Predicting Changes in Pediatric Medical Complexity using Large Longitudinal Health Records.利用大型纵向健康记录预测儿科医疗复杂性的变化
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1838-1847. eCollection 2017.
7
A new disability-related health care needs assessment tool for persons with brain disorders.一种针对脑部疾病患者的新型残疾相关医疗保健需求评估工具。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013 Sep;46(5):282-90. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.5.282. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Unmet healthcare needs in people with disabilities: comparison with the general population in Korea.残疾人未满足的医疗保健需求:与韩国普通人群的比较。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Oct;35(5):627-35. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.5.627. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
9
Children with complex chronic conditions in inpatient hospital settings in the United States.美国住院医院环境中患有复杂慢性疾病的儿童。
Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):647-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3266. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities.利用行政数据研究残疾人
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):347-79. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00007.
2
Uses of evidence in disability outcomes and effectiveness research.证据在残疾结果与有效性研究中的应用。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):325-45. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00006.
3
Health services research for children with disabilities.针对残疾儿童的卫生服务研究。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):303-24. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00005.
4
The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities.为残疾人提供的卫生服务的组织与筹资。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):261-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00004.
5
American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines.美国流行病学学会伦理准则
Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;10(8):487-97. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)90000-0.
6
Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research.使我们的工具具备可用性:适应性、通用设计以及参与研究的机会。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S5-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20618.
7
Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services.行动障碍与筛查及预防服务的使用
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):955-61. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.955.
8
The built environment as a component of quality care: understanding and including the patient's perspective.作为优质护理组成部分的建成环境:理解并纳入患者视角。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Jul;25(7):352-62. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30450-3.
9
Outcomes research: measuring the end results of health care.结果研究:衡量医疗保健的最终结果。
Science. 1998 Oct 9;282(5387):245-6. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5387.245.
10
The "patient-centered" outcomes of critical care: what are they and how should they be used?重症监护的“以患者为中心”的结局:它们是什么以及应如何使用?
New Horiz. 1998 Feb;6(1):26-32.