Clark Kenneth W, Dawson William B, Muka Edward, Pilgram Thomas K, Blaine G James
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:53-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5031-z. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
We compared laser- and CCD-digitized images for perceived image quality differences in a radiologist-observer study. Films of 50 two- and three-view studies (ankles, chests, c-spines, shoulders) were digitized on calibrated laser (Kodak Lumisys 75) and CCD (VIDAR SIERRA Plus) digitizers. Six radiologists independently compared digitized images on twin high-resolution monochrome monitors. Matching images were randomly presented on left/right monitors to support blinded comparisons. Observers scored image quality (for several diagnostic criteria) as "no different," left or right image "slightly" or "significantly" different. Of 7324 responses, 77.8% scored "no different" and 21.9% "slightly different" (5.9% favoring CCD, 16.0% favoring laser). In only 0.3% did observers score "significantly different." The Lumisys laser images were assessed as only slightly better than VIDAR SIERRA CCD images. Digitizer equipment-selection decisions can, therefore, be considered on the basis of price, reliability, support, ease-of-use, etc., rather than solely on the basis of image quality.
在一项放射科医生观察性研究中,我们比较了激光数字化图像和电荷耦合器件(CCD)数字化图像在感知图像质量上的差异。选取了50例双视图和三视图研究(踝关节、胸部、颈椎、肩部)的胶片,分别在校准后的激光数字化仪(柯达Lumisys 75)和CCD数字化仪(VIDAR SIERRA Plus)上进行数字化处理。六位放射科医生在两台高分辨率单色显示器上独立比较数字化图像。匹配的图像随机显示在左/右显示器上,以支持盲法比较。观察者对图像质量(根据多个诊断标准)进行评分,分为“无差异”、左图或右图“略有”或“显著”差异。在7324份反馈中,77.8%的评分是“无差异”,21.9%是“略有差异”(5.9%倾向于CCD,16.0%倾向于激光)。只有0.3%的观察者评分“显著差异”。Lumisys激光图像的评估结果仅略优于VIDAR SIERRA CCD图像。因此,数字化仪设备的选择决策可以基于价格、可靠性、支持、易用性等因素来考虑,而不是仅仅基于图像质量。