Suppr超能文献

少即是多:寻找循证答案的实用方法。

When less is more: a practical approach to searching for evidence-based answers.

作者信息

Grandage Karen K, Slawson David C, Shaughnessy Allen F

机构信息

Calude Moore Health Sciences Library, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22908, USA.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):298-304.

Abstract

The information needs of practicing clinicians are distinct from the needs of students, researchers, or nonclinical personnel. Clinicians seek information to stay current with new relevant medical developments and to find answers to patient-specific questions. The volume of available information makes clinicians' tasks of rapidly identifying high-quality studies daunting. New tools evaluate the rigor and relevance of information and summarize it in the form of synthesized clinical answers. These sources have the opposite focus of many other information tools in that they strive to provide less information rather than more. With the development of these sources of validated and refined information, a new search approach is needed to locate clinical information in which speed is the benchmark. The existing medical literature, including these new refinement tools, can be conceptualized as a pyramid, with the most useful information, based on validity and relevance, placed at the apex. Use of this hierarchy allows searchers to drill down through progressive layers until they find their answers. Librarians can play a significant role in evaluating the ever-increasing variety of these synthesized resources, placing them into the searching hierarchy, and training clinicians to search from the top down.

摘要

执业临床医生的信息需求不同于学生、研究人员或非临床人员的需求。临床医生寻求信息以跟上新的相关医学发展,并找到针对特定患者问题的答案。可用信息的数量使得临床医生快速识别高质量研究的任务令人生畏。新工具评估信息的严谨性和相关性,并以综合临床答案的形式进行总结。这些来源与许多其他信息工具的重点相反,因为它们努力提供更少而不是更多的信息。随着这些经过验证和完善的信息来源的发展,需要一种新的搜索方法来定位以速度为基准的临床信息。包括这些新的完善工具在内的现有医学文献可以被概念化为一个金字塔,基于有效性和相关性,最有用的信息位于塔尖。使用这种层次结构允许搜索者逐层深入,直到找到他们的答案。图书馆员在评估这些日益多样化的综合资源、将它们纳入搜索层次结构以及培训临床医生自上而下进行搜索方面可以发挥重要作用。

相似文献

2
Expert searching in public health.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):97-103.
4
Asking questions, knowing answers.
Health Info Libr J. 2001 Dec;18(4):238-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2001.00356.x.
5
Academic health sciences librarians' contributions to institutional animal care and use committees.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jul;102(3):215-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.014.
6
Developing a general practice library: a collaborative project between a GP and librarian.
Health Info Libr J. 2001 Dec;18(4):192-202. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2001.00341.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional medical education approaches: mobilizing evidence for clinicians.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 28;10:1071545. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1071545. eCollection 2023.
2
Classifying information-sharing methods.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 May 22;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01292-z.
3
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;8(8):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub4.
6
Unanswered clinical questions: a survey of specialists and primary care providers.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):4-11. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.101.
7
Development of a Search Strategy for an Evidence Based Retrieval Service.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167170. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.
NIH Consens Statement. 2000;17(1):1-45.
2
Evidence-based librarianship: an overview.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000 Oct;88(4):289-302.
4
American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on intestinal ischemia.
Gastroenterology. 2000 May;118(5):951-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70182-x.
5
Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care.
BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):358-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358.
6
The evolving role of the librarian in evidence-based medicine.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jul;87(3):322-8.
7
Evidence-based practice.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998 Jul;86(3):396-401.
9
Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management.
Lancet. 1997;350(9094):1795-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08140-3.
10
Evidence-based medicine and general practice.
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):449-52.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验