• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生提出的有关患者护理问题的分析。

Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care.

作者信息

Ely J W, Osheroff J A, Ebell M H, Bergus G R, Levy B T, Chambliss M L, Evans E R

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01291-D PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):358-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358
PMID:10435959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC28191/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterise the information needs of family doctors by collecting the questions they asked about patient care during consultations and to classify these in ways that would be useful to developers of knowledge bases.

DESIGN

Observational study in which investigators visited doctors for two half days and collected their questions. Taxonomies were developed to characterise the clinical topic and generic type of information sought for each question.

SETTING

Eastern Iowa.

PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of 103 family doctors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of questions posed, pursued, and answered; topic and generic type of information sought for each question; time spent pursuing answers; information resources used.

RESULTS

Participants asked a total of 1101 questions. Questions about drug prescribing, obstetrics and gynaecology, and adult infectious disease were most common and comprised 36% of all questions. The taxonomy of generic questions included 69 categories; the three most common types, comprising 24% of all questions, were "What is the cause of symptom X?" "What is the dose of drug X?" and "How should I manage disease or finding X?" Answers to most questions (702, 64%) were not immediately pursued, but, of those pursued, most (318, 80%) were answered. Doctors spent an average of less than 2 minutes pursuing an answer, and they used readily available print and human resources. Only two questions led to a formal literature search.

CONCLUSIONS

Family doctors in this study did not pursue answers to most of their questions. Questions about patient care can be organised into a limited number of generic types, which could help guide the efforts of knowledge base developers.

摘要

目的

通过收集家庭医生在会诊期间询问的有关患者护理的问题,来描述他们的信息需求,并以对知识库开发者有用的方式对这些问题进行分类。

设计

观察性研究,研究人员对医生进行了两个半天的走访并收集他们提出的问题。开发了分类法来描述每个问题所寻求的临床主题和信息的一般类型。

地点

爱荷华州东部。

参与者

103名家庭医生的随机样本。

主要观察指标

提出、追问和回答的问题数量;每个问题所寻求的信息的主题和一般类型;追问答案所花费的时间;使用的信息资源。

结果

参与者共提出1101个问题。关于药物处方、妇产科和成人传染病的问题最为常见,占所有问题的36%。一般问题的分类法包括69个类别;三种最常见的类型,占所有问题的24%,分别是“症状X的病因是什么?”“药物X的剂量是多少?”以及“我应该如何处理疾病或检查结果X?”大多数问题(702个,64%)没有立即追问答案,但在追问的问题中,大多数(318个,80%)得到了回答。医生追问一个答案平均花费不到2分钟,他们使用的是现成的印刷资源和人力资源。只有两个问题导致了正式的文献检索。

结论

本研究中的家庭医生没有追问大多数问题的答案。关于患者护理的问题可以组织成有限数量的一般类型,这有助于指导知识库开发者的工作。

相似文献

1
Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care.家庭医生提出的有关患者护理问题的分析。
BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):358-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358.
2
Analysis of questions asked by family physicians regarding patient care.家庭医生关于患者护理所提问题的分析。
West J Med. 2000 May;172(5):315-9. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.5.315.
3
A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study.一般临床问题的分类法:分类研究
BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):429-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.429.
4
Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.运用证据回答医生有关患者护理问题的障碍:定性研究
BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):710. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7339.710.
5
Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer.医生无法回答的患者护理问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):407-14. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2398. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
6
Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians.基层医疗医生的信息需求与信息寻求行为
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):345-52. doi: 10.1370/afm.681.
7
[Study of the Information requirements generated by primary care doctors (ENIGMA Project)].[基层医疗医生产生的信息需求研究(ENIGMA项目)]
Aten Primaria. 2006 Sep;38(4):219-24. doi: 10.1157/13092344.
8
Answering clinical questions in the ED.在急诊科回答临床问题。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):144-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.031.
9
A study of clinical questions in primary care.一项关于初级保健中临床问题的研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2000 Dec;55(4):486-92.
10
What clinical information resources are available in family physicians' offices?家庭医生办公室可获取哪些临床信息资源?
J Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;48(2):135-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic classification of Indonesian consumer health questions.印度尼西亚消费者健康问题的语义分类。
J Biomed Semantics. 2025 Jul 28;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13326-025-00334-5.
2
The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Trust on the Utilization of Family Doctor Services: A Chinese Cross-Sectional Survey Based on McAllister's Theory.认知信任和情感信任对家庭医生服务利用的影响:基于麦卡利斯特理论的中国横断面调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 17;19:1463-1473. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S504605. eCollection 2025.
3
Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study.英国临床医生在护理点何处寻找信息?一项务实的探索性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02627-7.
4
Evaluating the Usability and Quality of a Clinical Mobile App for Assisting Physicians in Head Computed Tomography Scan Ordering: Mixed Methods Study.评估一款用于协助医师下达头部计算机断层扫描医嘱的临床移动应用程序的可用性和质量:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 9;11:e55790. doi: 10.2196/55790.
5
Extractive Clinical Question-Answering With Multianswer and Multifocus Questions: Data Set Development and Evaluation Study.具有多答案和多焦点问题的提取式临床问答:数据集开发与评估研究
JMIR AI. 2023 Jun 20;2:e41818. doi: 10.2196/41818.
6
Personalized Health Care in a Data-Driven Era: A Post-COVID-19 Retrospective.数据驱动时代的个性化医疗保健:新冠疫情后的回顾
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Jun;1(2):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care.临床实践指南的信息图摘要:初级保健中对 BMJ 快速推荐进行用户测试的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):e071847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071847.
8
What information sources do Dutch medical specialists use in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study.荷兰医学专家在医疗决策中使用哪些信息来源:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 5;13(10):e073905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073905.
9
Research interests of family physicians applying for research training.家庭医生申请研究培训的研究兴趣。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04562-0.
10
Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians' medical expertise: I. Reimagining Maintenance of Certification to promote lifelong learning.认知视角下的医师医学专长维持:一、重新构想以促进终身学习为目的的继续医学教育认证。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 24;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00496-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical jazz: harmonizing clinical experience and evidence-based medicine.临床爵士乐:协调临床经验与循证医学
J Fam Pract. 1998 Dec;47(6):425-8.
2
Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "evidence cart".在临床查房过程中寻找和应用证据:“证据推车”。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1336-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1336.
3
InfoRetriever: rapid access to evidence-based information on a hand-held computer.信息检索器:在手持计算机上快速获取基于证据的信息。
MD Comput. 1998 Sep-Oct;15(5):289, 292-7.
4
General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey.全科医生对循证医学途径的认知:一项问卷调查
BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):361-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.361.
5
Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine".“循证医学”之“证据”中的问题。
Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):529-35. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00244-1.
6
Physicians' preferences for information sources: a meta-analytic study.医生对信息来源的偏好:一项荟萃分析研究。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Jul;85(3):223-32.
7
What clinical information do doctors need?医生需要哪些临床信息?
BMJ. 1996 Oct 26;313(7064):1062-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1062.
8
Answering clinical questions.回答临床问题。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Aug;43(2):140-4.
9
Generic queries for meeting clinical information needs.满足临床信息需求的通用查询。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Apr;81(2):195-206.
10
"In the balance": weighing the evidence.“权衡之中”:权衡证据
Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 15;120(10):889. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-10-199405150-00012.