Stead Martine, Hastings Gerard, Eadie Douglas
Centre for Social Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Health Educ Res. 2002 Jun;17(3):351-64. doi: 10.1093/her/17.3.351.
New health promotion and public health approaches such as media advocacy pose particular evaluation challenges. Evaluation is important to provide feedback to media advocacy practitioners on how to enhance their efforts, and to funders and researchers seeking to assess media advocacy's effectiveness as a health promotion strategy. The media advocacy evaluation literature contains some examples of promising evaluation approaches but is still evolving. A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of media advocacy is presented. Building on existing approaches to evaluation in media advocacy and on current thinking regarding evaluation in health promotion, it proposes a series of indicators and research methods for evaluating media advocacy at the levels of formative, process and outcome evaluation. The framework can be used to encourage strategic reflection on the media advocacy process, to guide evaluation of specific interventions, and to demonstrate to funders the importance and complexity of evaluation in this promising field.
诸如媒体宣传等新的健康促进和公共卫生方法带来了特殊的评估挑战。评估对于向媒体宣传从业者提供如何加强其工作的反馈很重要,对于寻求评估媒体宣传作为一种健康促进策略的效果的资助者和研究人员也很重要。媒体宣传评估文献包含一些有前景的评估方法的例子,但仍在不断发展。本文提出了一个媒体宣传评估的综合框架。该框架基于媒体宣传现有的评估方法以及当前关于健康促进评估的思路,提出了一系列用于在形成性、过程性和结果性评估层面评估媒体宣传的指标和研究方法。该框架可用于鼓励对媒体宣传过程进行战略反思,指导对具体干预措施的评估,并向资助者证明在这个有前景的领域进行评估的重要性和复杂性。