Suppr超能文献

对医生选择静脉用胶体液的影响。

Influences on physicians' choices of intravenous colloids.

作者信息

Miletin Michael S, Stewart Thomas E, Norton Peter G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jul;28(7):917-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1337-z. Epub 2002 May 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Controversy over the optimal intravenous fluid for volume resuscitation continues unabated. Our objectives were to characterize the demographics of physicians who prescribe intravenous colloids and determine factors that enter into their decision to choose a colloid.

DESIGN

Questionnaire with 61 items.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Ten percent ( n = 364) of frequent intravenous fluid prescribers in the province of Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS

The response rate was 74%. Colloid use in the past year was reported by 79% of the responding physicians. Important reasons for choosing a colloid included blood loss and manipulation of oncotic pressure. Physicians tended to prefer either albumin or pentastarch, but no important reasons were found for choosing between the two. Albumin with or without crystalloid was preferred in 5/13 scenarios by more than 50% of the respondents, whereas pentastarch was not favored by more than 50% of respondents in any scenario. Physicians practising in critical care areas and teaching hospitals generally preferred pentastarch to albumin. Physicians reporting pentastarch as representing greater than 90% of total colloid use were more likely to have been visited by a drug detailer for pentastarch than those who used less synthetic colloid (54 vs 22%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of physicians surveyed prescribe colloid products and the reported use of albumin and pentastarch has a bimodal distribution. Although albumin appeared to be preferred in more clinical niches, most physicians did not state reasons for choosing between products. Marketing, specialty, location of practice and clinical scenario appear to play significant roles in the utilization of colloid products.

摘要

目的

关于容量复苏的最佳静脉输液争议仍未平息。我们的目的是描述开具静脉胶体溶液的医生的人口统计学特征,并确定影响他们选择胶体溶液的因素。

设计

包含61个条目的问卷。

参与者及地点

加拿大安大略省10%(n = 364)的频繁开具静脉输液处方的医生。

结果

回复率为74%。79%的回复医生报告了过去一年中使用胶体溶液的情况。选择胶体溶液的重要原因包括失血和胶体渗透压的调节。医生倾向于选择白蛋白或羟乙基淀粉,但未发现选择两者之间的重要原因。在13种情况中的5种情况下,超过50%的受访者更倾向于使用含或不含晶体液的白蛋白,而在任何情况下,超过50%的受访者都不青睐羟乙基淀粉。在重症监护领域和教学医院执业的医生通常更喜欢羟乙基淀粉而非白蛋白。报告羟乙基淀粉占胶体溶液总使用量超过90%的医生,相比使用较少合成胶体的医生,更有可能有药品推销员拜访过他们(54%对22%,p < 0.001)。

结论

大多数接受调查的医生开具胶体产品,报告的白蛋白和羟乙基淀粉的使用呈双峰分布。尽管白蛋白在更多临床领域似乎更受青睐,但大多数医生并未说明选择产品的原因。营销、专业、执业地点和临床情况似乎在胶体产品的使用中发挥着重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验