Schaap Arty H P, van der Pol Hans G, Boer Kees, Leschot Nico J, Wolf Hans
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jul;22(7):598-604. doi: 10.1002/pd.371.
Next to procedure-related fetal loss, other adverse effects of invasive prenatal diagnosis have been reported: limb defects after chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or early amniocentesis and respiratory distress after amniocentesis (AC). Because minor abnormalities may be overlooked in routine follow-up, we obtained long-term follow-up data after CVS and AC.
1509 women with a singleton pregnancy who had transcervical CVS were matched by age and season of conception with 1509 women with singleton pregnancies who had AC. All procedures were performed during 1985-1991 for advanced maternal age >35 years. Data regarding congenital malformations (classified according Eurocat), neonatal and paediatric morbidity and complications of motor development, speech, hearing and visual function were obtained by questionnaire in 1993-1995.
Short-term outcome was known in all but ten infants. Questionnaires with a structured design were mailed to all women with a surviving infant (n=2810); 86.7% responded. No difference was detected between infants after CVS compared with infants after AC regarding congenital malformations (7.2% versus 6.3%), neonatal morbidity (15.1% versus 15.9%), paediatric morbidity with clinical treatment (7.7% versus 6.3%) or outpatient treatment only (43.9% versus 40.3%) and evident function disturbance (2.0% versus 2.0%) or doubtful function disturbance (6.3% versus 6.8%). The number of infants with physical growth <10th centile for Dutch infants was equal (10.1%). Sub-analysis for limb abnormalities or respiratory complications did not demonstrate differences between infants after CVS and AC. Only 10% of all congenital malformations were already known through routine post-partum follow-up.
An extensive long-term survey could not demonstrate differences of health status between infants after prenatal diagnosis by transcervical CVS and AC.
除了与操作相关的胎儿丢失外,有报道称侵入性产前诊断还存在其他不良影响:绒毛取样(CVS)或早期羊膜腔穿刺术后出现肢体缺陷,羊膜腔穿刺术(AC)后出现呼吸窘迫。由于在常规随访中可能会忽略轻微异常,我们获取了CVS和AC后的长期随访数据。
1509名单胎妊娠且经宫颈进行CVS的妇女,按年龄和受孕季节与1509名单胎妊娠且进行AC的妇女进行匹配。所有操作均在1985年至1991年期间针对年龄超过35岁的高龄产妇进行。1993年至1995年通过问卷调查获取了有关先天性畸形(根据欧洲先天性畸形登记系统分类)、新生儿和儿科发病率以及运动发育、言语、听力和视觉功能并发症的数据。
除10名婴儿外,所有婴儿的短期结局均已知。向所有存活婴儿的母亲(n = 2810)邮寄了结构化设计的问卷;86.7%的人做出了回应。在先天性畸形(7.2%对6.3%)、新生儿发病率(15.1%对15.9%)、需要临床治疗的儿科发病率(7.7%对6.3%)或仅需门诊治疗的儿科发病率(43.9%对40.3%)以及明显功能障碍(2.0%对2.0%)或可疑功能障碍(6.3%对6.8%)方面,CVS后婴儿与AC后婴儿之间未检测到差异。荷兰婴儿中身体生长低于第10百分位数的婴儿数量相等(10.1%)。对肢体异常或呼吸并发症的亚分析未显示CVS后婴儿与AC后婴儿之间存在差异。所有先天性畸形中只有10%是通过产后常规随访已知的。
一项广泛的长期调查未能证明经宫颈CVS和AC进行产前诊断后婴儿的健康状况存在差异。