Oczenski Wolfgang, Kepka Anton, Krenn Herbert, Fitzgerald Robert D, Schwarz Sylvia, Hörmann Christoph
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Economics of Medicine in Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vienna City Hospital-Lainz, Vienna, Austria.
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul;30(7):1467-71. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00011.
To evaluate patients without prior pulmonary disease after cardiac surgery and to determine whether resistive unloading by automatic tube compensation, pressure support ventilation, and continuous positive airway pressure has different effects on oxygen consumption, breathing pattern, gas exchange, and hemodynamics.
Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Tertiary care, postoperative intensive care unit.
Twenty-one patients scheduled for open heart coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Each patient was ventilated with all three modes in random order.
Patients were ventilated in three modes, each applied for 30 mins according to computer-generated randomization: pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O, continuous positive airway pressure, and automatic tube compensation. Oxygen consumption was calculated by means of indirect calorimetry. The hypnotic state of the patients was monitored by Bispectral Index. For hemodynamic measurements, a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. The main finding of our study was that oxygen consumption and breathing pattern (tidal volume and respiratory rate) did not differ significantly during automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure (oxygen consumption, 170 +/- 29 vs. 170 +/- 26 vs. 174 +/- 29 mL.min.m, respectively; tidal volume, 466 +/- 132 vs. 484 +/- 125 vs. 470 +/- 119 mL, respectively; respiratory rate, 16 +/- 4 vs. 15 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 4 breaths/min, respectively). Automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation had no clinical effects on gas exchange and hemodynamic variables compared with continuous positive airway pressure. None of the variables differed significantly during the three ventilatory settings.
In postoperative tracheally intubated patients with normal ventilatory demand, automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O lead to identical oxygen consumption, breathing patterns, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. We, therefore, suggest that this group of patients does not need any additional positive pressure support from the ventilator to overcome the additional work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube during the weaning phase from mechanical ventilation.
评估心脏手术后无既往肺部疾病的患者,并确定自动管道补偿、压力支持通气和持续气道正压通气进行的阻力卸载对氧耗、呼吸模式、气体交换和血流动力学是否有不同影响。
前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
三级医疗术后重症监护病房。
21例计划接受心脏直视冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者。
每位患者按随机顺序采用三种模式进行通气。
患者采用三种模式通气,每种模式根据计算机生成的随机顺序应用30分钟:5 cm H₂O压力支持通气、持续气道正压通气和自动管道补偿。通过间接测热法计算氧耗。通过脑电双频指数监测患者的催眠状态。为进行血流动力学测量,插入一根光纤肺动脉导管。我们研究的主要发现是,与持续气道正压通气相比,自动管道补偿和压力支持通气期间的氧耗和呼吸模式(潮气量和呼吸频率)无显著差异(氧耗分别为170±29、170±26和174±29 mL·min·m;潮气量分别为466±132、484±125和470±119 mL;呼吸频率分别为16±4、15±4和16±4次/分钟)。与持续气道正压通气相比,自动管道补偿和压力支持通气对气体交换和血流动力学变量无临床影响。在三种通气设置期间,各变量均无显著差异。
在通气需求正常的术后气管插管患者中,自动管道补偿和5 cm H₂O压力支持通气导致相同的氧耗、呼吸模式、气体交换和血流动力学。因此,我们建议,在机械通气撤机阶段,这组患者不需要呼吸机提供任何额外的正压支持来克服气管插管带来的额外呼吸功。