Fabry B, Haberthür C, Zappe D, Guttmann J, Kuhlen R, Stocker R
Clinic for Heart & Thoracic Surgery, University Clinics Basel, Switzerland.
Intensive Care Med. 1997 May;23(5):545-52. doi: 10.1007/s001340050371.
We designed a new ventilatory mode to support spontaneously breathing, intubated patients and to improve weaning from mechanical ventilation. This mode, named Automatic Tube Compensation (ATC), compensates for the flow-dependent pressure drop across the endotracheal tube (ETT) and controls tracheal pressure to a constant value. In this study, we compared ATC with conventional patient-triggered inspiratory pressure support (IPS).
A prospective, interventional study.
A medical intensive care unit (ICU) and an ICU for heart and thoracic surgery in a university hospital.
We investigated two groups of intubated, spontaneously breathing patients: ten postoperative patients without lung injury, who had a normal minute ventilation (VE) of 7.6 +/- 1.7 l/min, and six critically ill patients who showed increased ventilatory demand (VE = 16.8 +/- 3.0 l/ min).
We measured the breathing pattern [VE, tidal volume (VT), and respiratory rate (RR)] and additional work of breathing (WOBadd) due to ETT resistance and demand valve resistance. Measurements were performed under IPS of 5, 10, and 15 mbar and under ATC.
The response of VT, RR, and WOBadd to different ventilatory modes was different in both patient groups, whereas VE remained unchanged. In postoperative patients, ATC, IPS of 10 mbar, and IPS of 15 mbar were sufficient to compensate for WOBadd. In contrast, WOBadd under IPS was greatly increased in patients with increased ventilatory demand, and only ATC was able to compensate for WOBadd.
The breathing pattern response to IPS and ATC is different in patients with differing ventilatory demand. ATC, in contrast to IPS, is a suitable mode to compensate for WOBadd in patients with increased ventilatory demand. When WOBadd was avoided using ATC, the patients did not need additional pressure support.
我们设计了一种新的通气模式,用于支持自主呼吸的插管患者,并改善机械通气的撤机过程。这种模式名为自动管道补偿(ATC),可补偿气管插管(ETT)上与流量相关的压力降,并将气管压力控制在恒定值。在本研究中,我们将ATC与传统的患者触发吸气压力支持(IPS)进行了比较。
一项前瞻性干预研究。
大学医院的内科重症监护病房(ICU)以及心脏和胸外科ICU。
我们调查了两组自主呼吸的插管患者:10名无肺损伤的术后患者,其分钟通气量(VE)正常,为7.6±1.7升/分钟;以及6名通气需求增加的重症患者(VE = 16.8±3.0升/分钟)。
我们测量了呼吸模式[VE、潮气量(VT)和呼吸频率(RR)]以及由于ETT阻力和需求阀阻力导致的额外呼吸功(WOBadd)。测量在5、10和15毫巴的IPS以及ATC条件下进行。
两组患者中,VT、RR和WOBadd对不同通气模式的反应不同,而VE保持不变。在术后患者中,ATC、10毫巴的IPS和15毫巴的IPS足以补偿WOBadd。相比之下,通气需求增加的患者在IPS下WOBadd大幅增加,只有ATC能够补偿WOBadd。
通气需求不同的患者对IPS和ATC的呼吸模式反应不同。与IPS相比,ATC是补偿通气需求增加患者WOBadd的合适模式。当使用ATC避免WOBadd时,患者不需要额外的压力支持。