Otero L, Palacio V, Mendez F J, Vazquez F
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Med Mycol. 2002 Jun;40(3):319-22. doi: 10.1080/mmy.40.3.319.322.
To establish the best method for boric acid susceptibility testing, we compared two agar dilution methods (high and low inoculum) and a standard broth microdilution method (from the National Commitee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document NCCLS M-27A). Saccharomyces cerevisiae (37) and non-C. albicans Candida (39) isolates, as well as one isolate of Trichosporon sp., were included. All were isolated from female workers with vulvovaginitis. Good agreement within a fourfold dilution range was found between the three methods, and only the broth microdilution method versus the agar dilution method with high inoculum showed significant discrepancies. Reading results was easier with the broth microdilution method than with the agar dilution methods because of partial growth inhibition in the latter. In conclusion, broth microdilution is a suitable method for testing yeast susceptibility to boric acid.
为确定硼酸药敏试验的最佳方法,我们比较了两种琼脂稀释法(高接种量和低接种量)和一种标准肉汤微量稀释法(依据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会文件NCCLS M-27A)。纳入了酿酒酵母(37株)和非白念珠菌念珠菌(39株)分离株,以及一株毛孢子菌属分离株。所有菌株均从患有外阴阴道炎的女工中分离得到。三种方法在四倍稀释范围内具有良好的一致性,仅肉汤微量稀释法与高接种量琼脂稀释法之间存在显著差异。由于琼脂稀释法存在部分生长抑制现象,肉汤微量稀释法比琼脂稀释法更易于读取结果。总之,肉汤微量稀释法是检测酵母对硼酸敏感性的合适方法。