Krieger John N, Ross Susan O, Deutsch Leslie, Riley Donald E
Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2002 Aug;3(4):301-6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-002-0054-z.
The new National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification identifies chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) based on the presence or absence of leukocytes in expressed prostatic secretions (EPS), postprostatic massage urine (VB3), or seminal fluid analysis. The purpose of this review is to determine the effect of the new classification on the proportion of symptomatic patients diagnosed with inflammation. We compare and contrast the new consensus classification with the traditional classification of prostatitis syndromes, then review how these changes effect patient classification in our clinical practice. Thorough clinical and microbiologic examination of 140 patients attending the University of Washington Prostatitis Clinic included evaluation of first void urine, mid-stream urine, EPS, VB3, and semen specimens. Inflammation was documented in 111 (26%) of 420 samples including 39 EPS samples, 32 VB3 samples, and 40 SFA specimens. Of the 140 patients, 73 (52%) had inflammatory CP/CPPS according to the NIH consensus criteria, but only 39 (28%) had nonbacterial prostatitis according to traditional EPS criteria (P < 0.001). The new NIH consensus concept of inflammatory CP/CPPS includes almost twice as many patients as the traditional category of nonbacterial prostatitis.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)新的共识分类根据前列腺按摩液(EPS)、前列腺按摩后尿液(VB3)或精液分析中白细胞的有无来识别慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)。本综述的目的是确定新分类对诊断为炎症的有症状患者比例的影响。我们将新的共识分类与前列腺炎综合征的传统分类进行比较和对比,然后回顾这些变化如何影响我们临床实践中的患者分类。对华盛顿大学前列腺炎诊所的140名患者进行了全面的临床和微生物学检查,包括对首次晨尿、中段尿、EPS、VB3和精液标本的评估。在420份样本中的111份(26%)记录到炎症,包括39份EPS样本、32份VB3样本和40份精液分析(SFA)标本。在140名患者中,根据NIH共识标准,73名(52%)患有炎症性CP/CPPS,但根据传统的EPS标准,只有39名(28%)患有非细菌性前列腺炎(P<0.001)。NIH关于炎症性CP/CPPS的新共识概念所涵盖的患者几乎是非细菌性前列腺炎传统分类的两倍。