Bolli Roberto, Shinmura Ken, Tang Xian-Liang, Kodani Eitaro, Xuan Yu-Ting, Guo Yiru, Dawn Buddhadeb
Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville, 550 South Jackson St., KY 40202, USA.
Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Aug 15;55(3):506-19. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00414-5.
More than 10 years after its discovery, the function of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the cardiovascular system remains largely an enigma. Many scholars have assumed that the allegedly detrimental effects of COX-2 in other systems (e.g. proinflammatory actions and tumorigenesis) signify a detrimental role of this protein in cardiovascular homeostasis as well. This view, however, is ill-founded. Recent studies have demonstrated that ischemic preconditioning (PC) upregulates the expression and activity of COX-2 in the heart, and that this increase in COX-2 activity mediates the protective effects of the late phase of PC against both myocardial stunning and myocardial infarction. An obligatory role of COX-2 has been observed in the setting of late PC induced not only by ischemia but also by delta-opioid agonists and physical exercise, supporting the view that the recruitment of this protein is a central mechanism whereby the heart protects itself from ischemia. The beneficial actions of COX-2 appear to be mediated by the synthesis of PGE(2) and/or PGI(2). Since inhibition of iNOS in preconditioned myocardium blocks COX-2 activity whereas inhibition of COX-2 does not affect iNOS activity, COX-2 appears to be downstream of iNOS in the protective pathway of late PC. The results of these studies challenge the widely accepted paradigm that views COX-2 activity as detrimental. The discovery that COX-2 plays an indispensable role in the anti-stunning and anti-infarct effects of late PC demonstrates that the recruitment of this protein is a fundamental mechanism whereby the heart adapts to stress, thereby revealing a novel, hitherto unappreciated cardioprotective function of COX-2. From a practical standpoint, the recognition that COX-2 is an obligatory co-mediator (together with iNOS) of the protection afforded by late PC has implications for the clinical use of COX-2 selective inhibitors as well as nonselective COX inhibitors. For example, the possibility that inhibition of COX-2 activity may augment myocardial cell death by obliterating the innate defensive response of the heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury needs to be considered and is the object of much current debate. Furthermore, the concept that the COX-2 byproducts, PGE(2) and/or PGI(2), play a necessary role in late PC provides a basis for novel therapeutic strategies designed to enhance the biosynthesis of these cytoprotective prostanoids in the ischemic myocardium. From a conceptual standpoint, the COX-2 hypothesis of late PC expands our understanding of the function of this enzyme in the cardiovascular system and impels a critical reassessment of current thinking regarding the biologic significance of COX-2.
环氧化酶-2(COX-2)在心血管系统中的功能自被发现10多年来,在很大程度上仍是个谜。许多学者认为,COX-2在其他系统中所谓的有害作用(如促炎作用和肿瘤发生)也意味着该蛋白在心血管稳态中起有害作用。然而,这一观点是毫无根据的。最近的研究表明,缺血预处理(PC)可上调心脏中COX-2的表达和活性,且COX-2活性的这种增加介导了PC后期对心肌顿抑和心肌梗死的保护作用。在不仅由缺血而且由δ-阿片受体激动剂和体育锻炼诱导的后期PC情况下,已观察到COX-2起必不可少的作用,这支持了如下观点:该蛋白的募集是心脏保护自身免受缺血影响的核心机制。COX-2的有益作用似乎是由前列腺素E2(PGE2)和/或前列环素(PGI2)的合成介导的。由于在预处理心肌中抑制诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)可阻断COX-2活性,而抑制COX-2并不影响iNOS活性,因此在后期PC的保护途径中,COX-2似乎位于iNOS的下游。这些研究结果对将COX-2活性视为有害的广泛接受的范式提出了挑战。COX-2在后期PC的抗顿抑和抗梗死作用中起不可或缺作用这一发现表明,该蛋白的募集是心脏适应应激的基本机制,从而揭示了COX-2一种新的、迄今未被认识的心脏保护功能。从实际角度来看,认识到COX-2是后期PC所提供保护的必需共同介质(与iNOS一起)对COX-2选择性抑制剂以及非选择性COX抑制剂的临床应用具有影响。例如,需要考虑抑制COX-2活性可能通过消除心脏对缺血/再灌注损伤的固有防御反应而增加心肌细胞死亡的可能性,这也是当前许多争论的焦点。此外,COX-2的产物PGE2和/或PGI2在后期PC中起必要作用这一概念为旨在增强缺血心肌中这些细胞保护前列腺素生物合成的新治疗策略提供了基础。从概念角度来看,后期PC的COX-2假说扩展了我们对该酶在心血管系统中功能的理解,并促使对当前关于COX-2生物学意义的思维进行批判性重新评估。