Burpee S E, Kurian M, Murakame Y, Benevides S, Gagner M
Department of Surgery, Division of Laparoscopic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):899-904. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8122-x. Epub 2002 Feb 27.
Laparoscopic liver surgery is a field in its infancy, and scientific evidence of its benefits over those of traditional open techniques has not been shown. Various applications from wedge resections to formal segmental resections have been reported, but the technical ability does not necessarily translate into improved patient outcomes. There is an abundance of evidence reflecting the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [9, 12, 23], and some of these benefits have been linked to the decreased metabolic and immune responses involved [24, 27]. There is also accumulating evidence that tumor growth may be slower after laparoscopic surgery than after comparable open surgery, and that this is a result of less immune suppression [1]. It is not known whether laparoscopic liver surgery will convey similar benefits.
In this study, 14 pigs were assigned randomly to undergo a liver resection either by a laparoscopic or an open approach. Operative stress was assessed via cortisol, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein. The immune response was evaluated through delayed-type hypersensitivity skin antigen testing. Adhesion formation also was assessed at 6 weeks.
Immune response as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity is better preserved after laparoscopic than after open liver resection. The average diameter of induration was 46% greater in the laparoscopic group (20.71 +/- 2.7 mm versus 14.14 +/- 1.5 mm). Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor levels showed a significantly greater rise after open surgery. No difference was observed in the levels of C-reactive protein or cortisol. Adhesion formation was considerably less after laparoscopic resection.
Laparoscopic liver resection results in a diminished stress response, as compared with that of open resection, which translates into greater preservation of immune function. This finding may well have a beneficial effect on infection and tumor growth.
腹腔镜肝脏手术尚处于起步阶段,其相较于传统开放技术的优势尚未得到科学证据的证实。已有报道称腹腔镜肝脏手术可用于多种术式,从楔形切除到正规的肝段切除,但技术能力并不一定能转化为更好的患者预后。有大量证据表明腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有诸多益处[9, 12, 23],其中一些益处与所涉及的代谢和免疫反应降低有关[24, 27]。也有越来越多的证据表明,腹腔镜手术后肿瘤生长可能比类似的开放手术后更缓慢,这是免疫抑制较轻的结果[1]。目前尚不清楚腹腔镜肝脏手术是否会带来类似的益处。
在本研究中,14头猪被随机分配接受腹腔镜或开放入路的肝脏切除术。通过皮质醇、肿瘤坏死因子、白细胞介素-6、C反应蛋白评估手术应激。通过迟发型超敏皮肤抗原试验评估免疫反应。在6周时也评估粘连形成情况。
与开放肝脏切除术后相比,腹腔镜手术后通过迟发型超敏反应测量的免疫反应得到更好的保留。腹腔镜组硬结的平均直径大46%(20.71±2.7毫米对14.14±1.5毫米)。开放手术后白细胞介素-6和肿瘤坏死因子水平的升高明显更大。C反应蛋白或皮质醇水平未观察到差异。腹腔镜切除术后粘连形成明显较少。
与开放切除术相比,腹腔镜肝脏切除术导致应激反应减轻,这转化为免疫功能的更大保留。这一发现很可能对感染和肿瘤生长产生有益影响。