Holtmann G, Gschossmann J, Mayr P, Talley N J
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Essen, Germany.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Sep;16(9):1641-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01322.x.
To compare the efficacy of simethicone with placebo and the prokinetic cisapride in patients with functional dyspepsia.
One hundred and eighty-five patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized and treated in a double-dummy technique with simethicone (105 mg t.d.s.), cisapride (10 mg t.d.s.) or placebo (t.d.s.). The primary outcome measure was the O'Brien global measure of the patients' rating of 10 upper gastrointestinal symptoms (graded as absent = 0, moderate = 1, severe = 2 or very severe = 3). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment (intention-to-treat).
At 2, 4 and 8 weeks, treatment with simethicone and cisapride yielded significantly (all P values < 0.0001) better improvement of symptoms compared to placebo. Simethicone was significantly better than cisapride after 2 weeks (P = 0.0007), but the differences were not statistically significant after 4 and 8 weeks. Patients treated with simethicone judged the efficacy of their treatment as very good in 46% of cases, compared to 15% and 16% receiving cisapride and placebo, respectively.
Simethicone and cisapride were significantly better than placebo for symptom control in patients with functional dyspepsia after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Simethicone was also superior to the prokinetic cisapride in the first 2 weeks of treatment.
比较西甲硅油与安慰剂以及促动力药西沙必利对功能性消化不良患者的疗效。
185例功能性消化不良患者采用双盲双模拟技术随机分组,分别接受西甲硅油(105毫克,每日三次)、西沙必利(10毫克,每日三次)或安慰剂(每日三次)治疗。主要观察指标是奥布赖恩对10种上消化道症状的整体评分(无症状=0分,中度=1分,重度=2分,极重度=3分)。在基线以及治疗2、4和8周后(意向性分析)评估观察指标。
在治疗2、4和8周时,与安慰剂相比,西甲硅油和西沙必利治疗使症状改善更为显著(所有P值<0.0001)。治疗2周后,西甲硅油显著优于西沙必利(P=0.0007),但在治疗4周和8周后差异无统计学意义。接受西甲硅油治疗的患者中,46%认为治疗效果非常好,而接受西沙必利和安慰剂治疗的患者这一比例分别为15%和16%。
治疗2、4和8周后,西甲硅油和西沙必利在控制功能性消化不良患者症状方面显著优于安慰剂。在治疗的前2周,西甲硅油也优于促动力药西沙必利。