Suppr超能文献

在治疗餐后不适综合征中的疗效:一项开放标签随机对照试验。

Efficacy of in treatment of postprandial distress syndrome: An open-label randomized-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen, 40000, Thailand.

Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2019 Oct 30;8:1827. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20662.1. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors are effective for functional dyspepsia but ineffective in relieving postprandial distress syndrome. might be effective for postprandial distress syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of and simethicone for postprandial distress syndrome in an open-label randomized-controlled trial. This trial was conducted between July 2018 and February 2019. In total, 78 patients were randomly assigned to receive 4 weeks of treatment with 750 or 1,500 mg oral per day or 240 mg simethicone per day. The patients assessed their symptoms using the dyspepsia Global Overall Symptom scale at baseline, week 2, and week 4. After stopping medication for 2 weeks, the patients assessed recurrent symptoms and day of recurrence by themselves at the end of week 6. In total, 78 patients underwent randomization (27 in 750 mg , 26 in 1500 mg , and 25 in simethicone groups). After 2 weeks, there were no significant differences in all mean changes of symptoms scores (95%CI) of postprandial distress syndrome [-4.1 (-4.5, -2.6) vs -4.3 (-5.2, -3.3) vs -4.2 (-4.8, -3.5), P=0.954]. Over a period of 4 weeks, the reduction in mean scores was greater among participants receiving simethicone (although not statistically significant) compared with two intervention groups [-4.6 (-5.7, -3.6) vs -5.4 (-6.6, -4.1) vs -6.2 (-7.2, -5.2), P=0.122]. The rate of recurrence was significantly lower in simethicone than the two groups (42.9 vs 45.5 vs 13.6%, P=0.047). There was no serious adverse event reported in all three groups. had a similar effect on treatment outcomes to simethicone after 2 and 4 weeks, but the recurrence rate of symptoms was significantly higher without serious adverse events. Registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on 31 January 2018; TCTR20180131001.

摘要

质子泵抑制剂对功能性消化不良有效,但对餐后不适综合征无效。可能对餐后不适综合征有效。本研究的目的是在一项开放标签、随机对照试验中比较和二甲硅油对餐后不适综合征的疗效。该试验于 2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 2 月进行。共有 78 名患者被随机分配接受 4 周的治疗,每天口服 750 或 1500 毫克或 240 毫克二甲硅油。患者在基线、第 2 周和第 4 周使用消化不良总体症状量表评估症状。停药 2 周后,患者在第 6 周末自行评估复发症状和复发日。共有 78 名患者接受了随机分组(750 毫克组 27 例,1500 毫克组 26 例,二甲硅油组 25 例)。2 周后,餐后不适综合征的所有症状评分(95%CI)的平均变化均无显著差异[-4.1(-4.5,-2.6)与-4.3(-5.2,-3.3)与-4.2(-4.8,-3.5),P=0.954]。在 4 周的时间内,与两个干预组相比,接受二甲硅油治疗的患者(尽管无统计学意义)的平均评分下降幅度更大[-4.6(-5.7,-3.6)与-5.4(-6.6,-4.1)与-6.2(-7.2,-5.2),P=0.122]。二甲硅油组的复发率明显低于两个组(42.9%比 45.5%比 13.6%,P=0.047)。三组均无严重不良事件报告。在 2 周和 4 周后,与二甲硅油相比,有相似的治疗效果,但症状复发率较高,且无严重不良事件。该研究于 2018 年 1 月 31 日在泰国临床试验注册中心注册;TCTR20180131001。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/7809885/0f5222c638d3/f1000research-8-22724-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验