Suppr超能文献

五种不同第一跖骨干截骨术中循环载荷的力学比较

Mechanical comparison of cyclic loading in five different first metatarsal shaft osteotomies.

作者信息

Acevedo Jorge I, Sammarco V James, Boucher Henry R, Parks Brent G, Schon Lew C, Myerson Mark S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Aug;23(8):711-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300806.

Abstract

The purposes of the current study were: 1. to analyze the relative fatigue endurance of five different first metatarsal shaft osteotomies (proximal crescentic, proximal chevron, Ludloff, Mau, and Scarf), as performed on sawbone models using the most common fixation techniques (part I); and 2. to compare the two more commonly used techniques (per part I results) in matched-pair cadaver specimens (part II). In part I, the proximal chevron and Mau osteotomies were significantly more stable (P < or = 0.005) than all other osteotomies except the Ludloff. In part II, there was no significant difference in fatigue endurance between the proximal chevron and Ludloff osteotomies.

摘要

本研究的目的如下

  1. 分析使用最常见固定技术在锯骨模型上进行的五种不同的第一跖骨干截骨术(近端新月形、近端人字形、Ludloff、Mau和Scarf)的相对疲劳耐力(第一部分);2. 在配对的尸体标本中比较两种更常用的技术(根据第一部分结果)(第二部分)。在第一部分中,近端人字形和Mau截骨术比除Ludloff之外的所有其他截骨术显著更稳定(P≤0.005)。在第二部分中,近端人字形和Ludloff截骨术之间的疲劳耐力没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验