Suppr超能文献

通过生物电阻抗光谱法和双能X线吸收法评估的健康儿科人群的身体成分。

Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population.

作者信息

Fors H, Gelander L, Bjarnason R, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bosaeus I

机构信息

Göteborg Pediatric Growth Research Center and Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgren's University Hospital, SE-413 85 Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(7):755-60. doi: 10.1080/08035250213215.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Fat-free mass (FFM), body fat mass and body fatness (percentage fat) were measured by DXA, BIA and BIS in 61 healthy children (37M, 24F, aged 10.9-13.9 y). Estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness were highly correlated (r = 0.73-0.96, p < 0.0001) between the different methods. However, a Bland-Altman comparison showed wide limits of agreement between the methods. The mean differences between methods for FFM ranged from -2.31 +/- 7.76 kg to 0.48 +/- 7.58 kg. Mean differences for body fat mass ranged from 0.16 +/- 5.06 kg to 2.95 +/- 5.65 kg and for body fatness from -2.3 +/- 7.8% to 0.8 +/- 9.3%. Calculations of body composition with BIS were not superior to BIA. However, BIA overestimated fat mass in lean, subjects and underestimated fat mass in overweight subjects more than BIS, compared with DXA.

CONCLUSION

The methods used provided estimates of FFM, body fat mass and body fatness that were highly correlated in a population of healthy children. However, the large limits of agreement derived from the Bland-Altman procedure suggest that the methods should not be used interchangeably.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是确定双能X线吸收法(DXA)、单频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和多频生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)测量身体成分之间的一致性水平。对61名健康儿童(37名男性,24名女性,年龄10.9 - 13.9岁)采用DXA、BIA和BIS测量去脂体重(FFM)、体脂肪量和体脂率(脂肪百分比)。不同方法之间FFM、体脂肪量和体脂率的估计值高度相关(r = 0.73 - 0.96,p < 0.0001)。然而,Bland - Altman比较显示各方法之间的一致性界限较宽。FFM各方法之间的平均差异范围为 - 2.31±7.76 kg至0.48±7.58 kg。体脂肪量的平均差异范围为0.16±5.06 kg至2.95±5.65 kg,体脂率的平均差异范围为 - 2.3±7.8%至0.8±9.3%。用BIS计算身体成分并不优于BIA。然而,与DXA相比,BIA在瘦受试者中高估脂肪量,在超重受试者中低估脂肪量的程度比BIS更大。

结论

所使用的方法在健康儿童群体中对FFM、体脂肪量和体脂率的估计高度相关。然而,Bland - Altman程序得出的较大一致性界限表明这些方法不应互换使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验