Carruthers J, Wilson J M, Chamberlain J, Husain O A, Patey D G, Richards N D, Pennicott A, Rogers P, Catling R, Meade T W, Saunders J, McEwan P J
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1975 Dec;29(4):239-48. doi: 10.1136/jech.29.4.239.
A randomized controlled trial was carried out in which the acceptability of screening for cervical carcinoma in situ by a postal 'do-it-yourself' method--the cytopipette--was compared with that of an invitation to attend a clinic or see a general practitioner for the conventional cervical scrape examination. In parallel with this, a sociological study of women who had been invited by both methods was undertaken in which information was obtained from responders and non-responders on attitudes to health care. The results show that, while the pipette was used by a greater proportion of women overall than the scrape examination, its acceptance by women most at risk of the disease is still not high. It is concluded that, taking into account the relative merits of the two methods as screening tests, as well as their acceptability and cost, the postal pipette may be useful in some circumstances, such as areas where clinical resources are limited, and as a second approach to women who have not taken up the offer of a scrape examination.
开展了一项随机对照试验,比较通过邮寄“自行操作”方法(细胞吸管)进行原位宫颈癌筛查的可接受性与邀请参加诊所或找全科医生进行传统宫颈刮片检查的可接受性。与此同时,对通过这两种方法被邀请的女性进行了一项社会学研究,从回应者和未回应者那里获取了她们对医疗保健态度的信息。结果表明,虽然总体上使用吸管的女性比例高于刮片检查,但疾病风险最高的女性对其接受度仍然不高。结论是,考虑到这两种方法作为筛查测试的相对优点以及它们的可接受性和成本,邮寄吸管在某些情况下可能有用,例如临床资源有限的地区,以及作为未接受刮片检查提议的女性的第二种检查方法。