Locke Lisa M, Prinz Ronald J
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;22(6):895-929. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00133-2.
This paper reviews the measurement of parental discipline and nurturance over the past 20 years. Discipline and nurturance are two of the most heavily referenced constructs in the parenting research literature, but there are varying ways to operationalize them with respect to both method and content. The review considered 76 questionnaires that purported to assess discipline, nurturance, or both. The evaluation included examination of a total of 27 interview schedules that used either in-person or telephone structured questions or a vignette format and focused on discipline and nurturance or discipline only. A total of 33 observational systems were reviewed, the majority of which addressed both discipline and nurturance. All measures were profiled, and several noteworthy instruments were discussed. Recommendations were offered regarding how to strengthen measurement and scientific understanding of discipline and nurturance, including the need for greater attention to cultural variation and measurement equivalence issues.
本文回顾了过去20年中对父母管教和养育方式的衡量。管教和养育是育儿研究文献中引用最多的两个概念,但在方法和内容方面,有多种方式对其进行操作化定义。该综述考虑了76份旨在评估管教、养育或两者兼有的问卷。评估包括对总共27份访谈提纲的审查,这些提纲采用面对面或电话结构化问题或 vignette 形式,重点关注管教和养育或仅关注管教。共审查了33个观察系统,其中大多数涉及管教和养育。对所有测量方法进行了概述,并讨论了几种值得注意的工具。针对如何加强对管教和养育的测量及科学理解提出了建议,包括需要更加关注文化差异和测量等效性问题。