Holas Vanessa, Thöne Ann-Kathrin, Dose Christina, Gebauer Stephanie, Hautmann Christopher, Görtz-Dorten Anja, Kohl Lea Teresa, Plück Julia, Treier Anne-Katrin, Banaschewski Tobias, Ravens-Sieberer Ulrike, Rößner Veit, Hanisch Charlotte, Kölch Michael, Holtmann Martin, Becker Katja, Renner Tobias, Geissler Julia, Wenning Jasmin, Huss Michael, Poustka Luise, Döpfner Manfred
School for Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Dec 16;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9.
The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years).
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age.
The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small.
The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.
本研究旨在开发并对一份由家长评定的养育评估量表进行心理测量学评估，该量表涵盖养育的积极和消极维度。在一项包含1879名学龄儿童（6.00至12.11岁）的五项研究的汇总样本中，对积极与消极养育行为评估量表（FPNE）的因子效度、信度、测量不变性、潜在均值差异和结构效度进行了测试。
对第一个随机划分的半样本进行探索性因子分析（EFA），并在样本的后半部分进行验证性因子分析（CFA）和探索性结构方程建模（ESEM）。进行测量不变性测试以评估性别和年龄之间的因子结构等效性。
EFA结果支持两因素结构，CFA结果揭示了一个具有两个相关因子（积极养育、消极养育）的模型，该模型包含23个项目，显示出可接受的模型拟合度和良好的心理测量学特性。ESEM未产生模型拟合度显著更好的模型。内部一致性是可接受的。FPNE与类似构念之间的低至中度相关性证明了足够的同时效度。因子结构在不同年龄组和性别之间是不变的（构型、度量、标量）。潜在均值差异测试表明，年龄较大的儿童在消极养育方面的得分显著高于年龄较小的儿童，而男孩与女孩相比，积极养育水平较低，消极养育水平较高。所有效应量都很小。
结果表明，FPNE是一种可靠且有效的养育评估工具。
