Loukogeorgakis Stavros, Dawson Rex, Phillips Nirree, Martyn Christopher N, Greenwald Stephen E
Department of Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Royal London Hospital, UK.
Physiol Meas. 2002 Aug;23(3):581-96. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/3/309.
We aimed to validate a new method for measuring arterial pulsewave transit time and pulsewave velocity (a measure of arterial elasticity), based on the principle of photoplethysmography (PPG), and to compare transcutaneous values with those obtained by intra-arterial measurements. Three validation experiments are described. (a) PPG pulse wave delay times (defined as the time interval between the ECG R wave and the foot of the arterial pulse wave measured at the wrist or ankle) were compared to values obtained simultaneously from an established methodology (Doppler ultrasound). (b) Aortic pulsewave delay times in 17 subjects obtained non-invasively by the PPG method were compared with those obtained from the intra-arterial pressure wave. (c) Repeatability measurements of PWV on the same subjects were carried out over two timescales (minutes and hours) in the arm, the leg and the trunk. The Doppler and PPG delay times correlated well, as did intra-arterial and transcutaneous values. Repeatability at short timescales was good (coefficients of variation (CV) < 6% for all measurement sites) and, at the longer timescale, was satisfactory (CVs in the aorta, the arm and leg were 6.3, 13.1 and 16.0, respectively). The PWV values agreed well with others in the literature. We conclude that the PPG technique provides a complement to existing methods for the non-invasive measurement of arterial compliance. Its simplicity and ease of use make it suitable for large-scale epidemiological studies.
我们旨在验证一种基于光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)原理测量动脉脉搏波传播时间和脉搏波速度(一种动脉弹性的测量指标)的新方法,并将经皮测量值与通过动脉内测量获得的值进行比较。描述了三个验证实验。(a)将PPG脉搏波延迟时间(定义为心电图R波与在手腕或脚踝处测量的动脉脉搏波波谷之间的时间间隔)与通过既定方法(多普勒超声)同时获得的值进行比较。(b)将通过PPG方法非侵入性获得的17名受试者的主动脉脉搏波延迟时间与从动脉内压力波获得的时间进行比较。(c)在手臂、腿部和躯干的同一受试者上,在两个时间尺度(分钟和小时)上进行脉搏波速度的重复性测量。多普勒和PPG延迟时间相关性良好,动脉内和经皮测量值也是如此。短时间尺度的重复性良好(所有测量部位的变异系数(CV)<6%),在较长时间尺度上也令人满意(主动脉、手臂和腿部的CV分别为6.3、13.1和16.0)。脉搏波速度值与文献中的其他值吻合良好。我们得出结论,PPG技术为动脉顺应性的非侵入性测量提供了对现有方法的补充。其简单性和易用性使其适用于大规模流行病学研究。