• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过同源概率计算以及利用显性(扩增片段长度多态性,AFLP)标记进行数量性状基因座定位的方法。

A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers.

作者信息

Pérez-Enciso Miguel, Roussot Odile

机构信息

Station d'Amelioration Génétique des Animaux, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

出版信息

Genet Res. 2002 Jun;79(3):247-58. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005645.

DOI:10.1017/s0016672302005645
PMID:12220132
Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a widely used marker system: the technique is very cost-effective, easy and rapid, and reproducibly generates hundreds of markers. Unfortunately, AFLP alleles are typically scored as the presence or absence of a band and, thus, heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes cannot be distinguished. This results in a significant loss of information, especially as regards mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). We present a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method that allows us to compute the identity by descent probabilities (IBD) in a general pedigree whose individuals have been typed for dominant markers. The method allows us to include the information provided by the fluorescent band intensities of the markers, the rationale being that homozygous individuals have on average higher band intensities than heterozygous individuals, as well as information from linked markers in each individual and its relatives. Once IBD probabilities are obtained, they can be combined into the QTL mapping strategy of choice. We illustrate the method with two simulated populations: an outbred population consisting of full sib families, and an F2 cross between inbred lines. Two marker spacings were considered, 5 or 20 cM, in the outbred population. There was almost no difference, for the practical purpose of QTL estimation, between AFLPs and biallelic codominant markers when the band density is taken into account, especially at the 5 cM spacing. The performance of AFLPs every 5 cM was also comparable to that of highly polymorphic markers (microsatellites) spaced every 20 cM. In economic terms, QTL mapping with a dense map of AFLPs is clearly better than microsatellite QTL mapping and little is lost in terms of accuracy of position. Nevertheless, at low marker densities, AFLPs or other biallelic markers result in very inaccurate estimates of QTL position.

摘要

扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)是一种广泛应用的标记系统:该技术性价比高、操作简便快捷,可重复性地产生数百个标记。不幸的是,AFLP等位基因通常根据条带的有无进行计分,因此无法区分杂合子和显性纯合子基因型。这导致了大量信息的丢失,尤其是在数量性状基因座(QTL)定位方面。我们提出了一种蒙特卡罗马尔可夫链方法,该方法使我们能够在一个普通家系中计算同源概率(IBD),该家系中的个体已针对显性标记进行了分型。该方法使我们能够纳入由标记的荧光条带强度提供的信息,其基本原理是纯合个体的条带强度平均高于杂合个体,同时还能纳入每个个体及其亲属中连锁标记的信息。一旦获得IBD概率,就可以将它们整合到所选的QTL定位策略中。我们用两个模拟群体说明了该方法:一个由全同胞家系组成的远交群体,以及近交系之间的F2杂交群体。在远交群体中考虑了两种标记间距,即5或20厘摩。在考虑条带密度时,尤其是在5厘摩的间距下,对于QTL估计的实际目的而言,AFLP与双等位基因共显性标记之间几乎没有差异。每5厘摩的AFLP性能也与每20厘摩间隔的高多态性标记(微卫星)相当。从经济角度来看,使用密集的AFLP图谱进行QTL定位明显优于微卫星QTL定位,并且在位置准确性方面几乎没有损失。然而,在低标记密度下,AFLP或其他双等位基因标记会导致QTL位置的估计非常不准确。

相似文献

1
A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers.一种通过同源概率计算以及利用显性(扩增片段长度多态性,AFLP)标记进行数量性状基因座定位的方法。
Genet Res. 2002 Jun;79(3):247-58. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005645.
2
Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib families using current recombinations.利用当前重组对半同胞家系中的数量性状位点进行精细定位。
Genet Res. 2000 Aug;76(1):87-104. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300004638.
3
Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for complex binary traits.复杂二元性状数量性状基因座的贝叶斯定位
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1391-403. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1391.
4
Optimal haplotype structure for linkage disequilibrium-based fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using identity by descent.基于家系同一性的数量性状基因座连锁不平衡精细定位的最佳单倍型结构
Genetics. 2006 Mar;172(3):1955-65. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048686. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
5
Detection of quantitative trait loci in outbred populations with incomplete marker data.利用不完全标记数据检测远交群体中的数量性状基因座。
Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):409-20. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.409.
6
Multipoint genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci with dominant markers in outbred populations.在远交群体中利用显性标记对数量性状基因座进行多点遗传定位。
Genetica. 1999;105(3):281-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1003981620837.
7
Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines.利用来自两个近交系的不同杂交组合中的显性和缺失标记定位数量性状基因座。
Genetica. 1997;101(1):47-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1018394410659.
8
Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for multiple complex traits with the use of variance components.使用方差成分对多个复杂性状的数量性状位点进行贝叶斯定位。
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Aug;81(2):304-20. doi: 10.1086/519495. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
9
Towards an expanded linkage map and exploration on co-dominant scoring of AFLPs in maize.构建更完善的玉米连锁图谱及AFLP共显性评分探索
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;32(9):960-8.
10
Bayes factors for detection of quantitative trait loci.用于检测数量性状位点的贝叶斯因子。
Genet Sel Evol. 2001 Mar-Apr;33(2):133-52. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-33-2-133.

引用本文的文献

1
Codominant scoring of AFLP in association panels.共显性 AFLP 在关联群体中的计分方法。
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Jul;121(2):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1313-x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
2
Efficient multipoint mapping: making use of dominant repulsion-phase markers.高效多点定位:利用显性相斥相标记
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Oct;107(6):1102-12. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1305-1. Epub 2003 Aug 20.