• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共显性 AFLP 在关联群体中的计分方法。

Codominant scoring of AFLP in association panels.

机构信息

Biometris, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Jul;121(2):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1313-x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00122-010-1313-x
PMID:20237752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2886132/
Abstract

A study on the codominant scoring of AFLP markers in association panels without prior knowledge on genotype probabilities is described. Bands are scored codominantly by fitting normal mixture models to band intensities, illustrating and optimizing existing methodology, which employs the EM-algorithm. We study features that improve the performance of the algorithm, and the unmixing in general, like parameter initialization, restrictions on parameters, data transformation, and outlier removal. Parameter restrictions include equal component variances, equal or nearly equal distances between component means, and mixing probabilities according to Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. Histogram visualization of band intensities with superimposed normal densities, and optional classification scores and other grouping information, assists further in the codominant scoring. We find empirical evidence favoring the square root transformation of the band intensity, as was found in segregating populations. Our approach provides posterior genotype probabilities for marker loci. These probabilities can form the basis for association mapping and are more useful than the standard scoring categories A, H, B, C, D. They can also be used to calculate predictors for additive and dominance effects. Diagnostics for data quality of AFLP markers are described: preference for three-component mixture model, good separation between component means, and lack of singletons for the component with highest mean. Software has been developed in R, containing the models for normal mixtures with facilitating features, and visualizations. The methods are applied to an association panel in tomato, comprising 1,175 polymorphic markers on 94 tomato hybrids, as part of a larger study within the Dutch Centre for BioSystems Genomics.

摘要

本文描述了一种在没有基因型概率先验知识的关联群体中对 AFLP 标记进行共显性评分的方法。通过对带型强度拟合正态混合模型,对带型进行共显性评分,说明了并优化了现有的使用 EM 算法的方法。我们研究了一些可以提高算法性能的特征,以及混合的一般特征,如参数初始化、参数限制、数据转换和异常值剔除。参数限制包括成分方差相等、成分均值之间的距离相等或几乎相等,以及根据 Hardy-Weinberg 平衡的混合概率。带型强度的直方图可视化,叠加正态密度,以及可选的分类评分和其他分组信息,进一步辅助共显性评分。我们发现,正如在分离群体中所发现的,带型强度的平方根转换有利于经验证据。我们的方法为标记位点提供了后验基因型概率。这些概率可以作为关联映射的基础,比标准的评分类别 A、H、B、C、D 更有用。它们还可以用于计算加性和显性效应的预测因子。描述了 AFLP 标记数据质量的诊断方法:偏好三成分混合模型、成分均值之间良好的分离以及具有最高均值的成分中缺乏单峰。在 R 中开发了软件,其中包含带有促进特征的正态混合模型,以及可视化功能。该方法应用于番茄的关联群体,该群体由 94 个番茄杂种中的 1175 个多态性标记组成,是荷兰生物系统基因组学中心更大研究的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/f5b4726ae027/122_2010_1313_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/a0a8a7a3044c/122_2010_1313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/548d7eb701ec/122_2010_1313_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/4f5a1173a813/122_2010_1313_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/f5b4726ae027/122_2010_1313_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/a0a8a7a3044c/122_2010_1313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/548d7eb701ec/122_2010_1313_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/4f5a1173a813/122_2010_1313_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/085e/2886132/f5b4726ae027/122_2010_1313_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Codominant scoring of AFLP in association panels.共显性 AFLP 在关联群体中的计分方法。
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Jul;121(2):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1313-x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
2
A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers.一种通过同源概率计算以及利用显性(扩增片段长度多态性,AFLP)标记进行数量性状基因座定位的方法。
Genet Res. 2002 Jun;79(3):247-58. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005645.
3
Diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis within a selected set of cultivated tomatoes.选定的一组栽培番茄的多样性和连锁不平衡分析
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Jun;117(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0755-x. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
4
Haplotype estimation from fuzzy genotypes using penalized likelihood.使用惩罚似然估计模糊基因型的单体型。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024219. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
5
Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome.限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)、随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)及扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)标记用于构建番茄基因组种内图谱的效率
Genome. 2000 Feb;43(1):29-40.
6
Multipoint genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci with dominant markers in outbred populations.在远交群体中利用显性标记对数量性状基因座进行多点遗传定位。
Genetica. 1999;105(3):281-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1003981620837.
7
Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines.利用来自两个近交系的不同杂交组合中的显性和缺失标记定位数量性状基因座。
Genetica. 1997;101(1):47-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1018394410659.
8
Population genetics of the yellow fever mosquito in Trinidad: comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.特立尼达黄热病蚊子的群体遗传学:扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)标记的比较
Mol Ecol. 1999 Jun;8(6):951-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00647.x.
9
Identification of two AFLP markers linked to bacterial wilt resistance in tomato and conversion to SCAR markers.鉴定与番茄青枯病抗性相关的两个AFLP标记并转化为SCAR标记。
Mol Biol Rep. 2009 Mar;36(3):479-86. doi: 10.1007/s11033-007-9204-1. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
10
Bin mapping of tomato diversity array (DArT) markers to genomic regions of Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum pennellii introgression lines.番茄多样性阵列(DArT)标记与番茄×彭氏烟草渐渗系基因组区域的 bin 映射。
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Mar;124(5):947-56. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1759-5. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative genetic and epigenetic diversity in pairs of sympatric, closely related plants with contrasting distribution ranges in south-eastern Iberian mountains.伊比利亚东南部山区具有不同分布范围的同域、近缘植物对的比较遗传和表观遗传多样性。
AoB Plants. 2020 Apr 8;12(3):plaa013. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa013. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
FitTetra 2.0 - improved genotype calling for tetraploids with multiple population and parental data support.FitTetra 2.0 - 提高了四倍体的基因型调用能力,支持多群体和双亲数据。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Mar 20;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2703-y.
3
Pheno2Geno - High-throughput generation of genetic markers and maps from molecular phenotypes for crosses between inbred strains.

本文引用的文献

1
AFLP markers in a molecular linkage map of maize: codominant scoring and linkage group ditsribution.玉米分子连锁图谱中的AFLP标记:共显性评分与连锁群分布
Theor Appl Genet. 1999 Aug;99(3-4):425-31. doi: 10.1007/s001220051253.
2
Diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis within a selected set of cultivated tomatoes.选定的一组栽培番茄的多样性和连锁不平衡分析
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Jun;117(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0755-x. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
3
AFLP technology for DNA fingerprinting.用于DNA指纹分析的扩增片段长度多态性技术。
Pheno2Geno——从近交系间杂交的分子表型高通量生成遗传标记和图谱。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Feb 19;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0475-6.
4
Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review.植物基因靶向和功能标记的研究进展综述。
Plant Methods. 2013 Feb 13;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-6.
5
Automated masking of AFLP markers improves reliability of phylogenetic analyses.自动屏蔽 AFLP 标记可提高系统发育分析的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049119. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Genotype calling in tetraploid species from bi-allelic marker data using mixture models.利用混合模型对来自双等位基因标记数据的四倍体物种进行基因型调用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 19;12:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-172.
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(6):1387-98. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.175.
4
Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances.几乎被遗忘还是最新实践?AFLP的应用、分析及进展。
Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Mar;12(3):106-17. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
5
Fragment length distributions and collision probabilities for AFLP markers.AFLP标记的片段长度分布及碰撞概率
Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00613.x.
6
QTL analysis of cadmium and zinc accumulation in the heavy metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens.重金属超积累植物天蓝遏蓝菜中镉和锌积累的数量性状基因座分析
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Sep;113(5):907-20. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0350-y. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
7
A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers.一种通过同源概率计算以及利用显性(扩增片段长度多态性,AFLP)标记进行数量性状基因座定位的方法。
Genet Res. 2002 Jun;79(3):247-58. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005645.
8
Characterization of AFLP markers in damselflies: prevalence of codominant markers and implications for population genetic applications.豆娘扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)标记的特征:共显性标记的普遍性及其在群体遗传学应用中的意义
Genome. 2001 Aug;44(4):677-84. doi: 10.1139/g01-051.
9
A comment on codominant scoring of AFLP markers.关于扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)标记共显性评分的评论
Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):925-6. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.925.
10
Codominant analysis of banding data from a dominant marker system by normal mixtures.通过正态混合对显性标记系统的条带数据进行共显性分析。
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1459-68. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1459.