Suppr超能文献

两种治疗睡眠呼吸暂停/低通气综合征方法的随机交叉试验:持续气道正压通气和下颌位置调整矫治器。

Randomized crossover trial of two treatments for sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular repositioning splint.

作者信息

Engleman Heather M, McDonald James P, Graham David, Lello Glenn E, Kingshott Ruth N, Coleman Emma L, Mackay Thomas W, Douglas Neil J

机构信息

Edinburgh Sleep Centre, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):855-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2109023.

Abstract

Mandibular repositioning splints (MRSs) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are used to treat the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). There are some data suggesting that patients with milder symptoms prefer MRS, but there are few comparative data on outcomes. Therefore, we performed a randomized crossover trial of 8 weeks of CPAP and 8 weeks of MRS treatment in consecutive new outpatients diagnosed with SAHS (apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] >or= 5/hour, and >or= 2 symptoms including sleepiness). Assessments at the end of both limbs comprised home sleep study, subjective ratings of treatment value, sleepiness, symptoms, and well-being, and objective tests of sleepiness and cognition. Forty-eight of 51 recruited patients completed the trial (12 women; age [mean +/- SD], 46 +/- 9 years; Epworth 14 +/- 4; median AHI, 22/hour; interquartile ratio [IQR], 11-43/hour). Significant (p <or= 0.01) differences between MRS and CPAP were observed for 7 of 21 variables (effect sizes, 0.3-0.6 SDs), all favoring CPAP, including AHI (15 +/- 16 and 8 +/- 6/hour, respectively), effectiveness rating, symptoms, Epworth (12 +/- 5 and 8 +/- 5, respectively), functional outcomes of sleepiness questionnaire, short-form 36 health survey mental component, and health transition scores. Objective sleepiness, cognitive performance, and preference for treatments were not different. In patients experiencing a mild form of the syndrome (AHI < 15, n = 18), symptoms, treatment efficacy and satisfaction, and subjective sleepiness were also better with CPAP than with MRS (effect sizes, 0.7-1.1 SDs). These results do not support these MRS devices as first-line treatment for sleepy patients with SAHS.

摘要

下颌重新定位矫治器(MRSs)和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)用于治疗睡眠呼吸暂停/低通气综合征(SAHS)。有一些数据表明症状较轻的患者更喜欢MRS,但关于治疗结果的比较数据很少。因此,我们对连续诊断为SAHS(呼吸暂停/低通气指数[AHI]≥5/小时,且有≥2种包括嗜睡在内的症状)的新门诊患者进行了一项随机交叉试验,分别进行8周的CPAP治疗和8周的MRS治疗。两个治疗阶段结束时的评估包括家庭睡眠研究、对治疗价值、嗜睡、症状和幸福感的主观评分,以及对嗜睡和认知的客观测试。51名招募患者中有48名完成了试验(12名女性;年龄[平均±标准差],46±9岁;Epworth评分14±4;AHI中位数,22/小时;四分位间距[IQR],11 - 43/小时)。在21个变量中的7个变量上观察到MRS和CPAP之间存在显著(p≤0.01)差异(效应大小,0.3 - 0.6标准差),所有这些差异均有利于CPAP,包括AHI(分别为15±16和8±6/小时)、有效性评分、症状、Epworth评分(分别为12±5和8±5)、嗜睡问卷的功能结果、简短健康调查36项精神成分以及健康转变评分。客观嗜睡、认知表现和对治疗的偏好没有差异。在患有轻度综合征形式(AHI < 15,n = 18)的患者中,CPAP在症状、治疗效果和满意度以及主观嗜睡方面也优于MRS(效应大小,0.7 - 1.1标准差)。这些结果不支持将这些MRS装置作为嗜睡SAHS患者的一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验