• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有既往孕中期流产史的患者:预防性宫颈环扎术还是系列经阴道超声检查?

Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?

作者信息

Berghella Vincenzo, Haas Susan, Chervoneva Inna, Hyslop Terry

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa., USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):747-51. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124289.

DOI:10.1067/mob.2002.124289
PMID:12237658
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare management with prophylactic cerclage versus serial transvaginal sonograms of the cervix in patients with prior second-trimester loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Singleton pregnancies with prior second-trimester spontaneous loss between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation were retrospectively reviewed. At the obstetricians' discretion, some were managed with prophylactic cerclage and some with serial transvaginal sonograms of the cervix, starting at 14 weeks, and cerclage only if cervical length was <25 mm or funneling was >25% before 24 weeks. All cerclages were McDonald. Primary outcome was preterm delivery at <35 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 177 patients with singleton pregnancies who had prior second-trimester loss identified, 66 received prophylactic cerclage and 111 were followed up with transvaginal sonography, of which 36% (40/111) had therapeutic cerclage because of cervical changes. The two management groups of prophylactic cerclage versus transvaginal sonography of the cervix did not differ in any measure of obstetric outcome, including preterm delivery at <35 weeks (23% vs 30%; P =.3), preterm delivery at <33 weeks (21% vs 26%; P =.5), or gestational age at delivery (34.6 +/- 6.8 weeks vs 34.4 +/- 6.8 weeks; P =.8).

CONCLUSION

In patients with prior second-trimester loss, serial transvaginal sonography of the cervix, with cerclage only if indicated by cervical changes, is a valuable alternative to a policy of uniform prophylactic cerclage.

摘要

目的

比较对既往有孕中期流产史患者采用预防性宫颈环扎术与系列经阴道宫颈超声检查的管理效果。

研究设计

回顾性分析单胎妊娠且既往有孕中期14至24周自然流产史的患者。根据产科医生的判断,部分患者采用预防性宫颈环扎术进行管理,部分患者从14周开始采用系列经阴道宫颈超声检查,仅在孕24周前宫颈长度<25 mm或漏斗形成>25%时进行宫颈环扎术。所有宫颈环扎术均采用麦克唐纳法。主要结局是孕35周前早产。

结果

在177例确诊有既往孕中期流产史的单胎妊娠患者中,66例接受了预防性宫颈环扎术,111例接受经阴道超声检查随访,其中36%(40/111)因宫颈变化接受了治疗性宫颈环扎术。预防性宫颈环扎术与经阴道宫颈超声检查这两种管理组在任何产科结局指标上均无差异,包括孕35周前早产(23%对30%;P = 0.3)、孕33周前早产(21%对26%;P = 0.5)或分娩时孕周(34.6±6.8周对34.4±6.8周;P = 0.8)。

结论

对于既往有孕中期流产史的患者,系列经阴道宫颈超声检查,仅在宫颈变化提示时进行宫颈环扎术,是统一预防性宫颈环扎术策略的一种有价值的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?有既往孕中期流产史的患者:预防性宫颈环扎术还是系列经阴道超声检查?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):747-51. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124289.
2
Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity?经阴道超声检查高危妊娠患者宫颈预测早产:宫颈环扎术能否预防早产?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):809-15. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70306-6.
3
Beyond Cervical Length: Association between Postcerclage Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Preterm Birth.超越宫颈长度:宫颈环扎术后经阴道超声参数与早产的关系。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Nov;36(13):1317-1324. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688480. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage.既往经阴道宫颈环扎术失败的患者:经腹与经阴道宫颈环扎术产科结局的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;183(4):836-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108837.
5
Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.无症状孕妇宫颈的经阴道超声检查:文献综述
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):302-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00645.x.
6
Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results.宫颈机能不全预防随机宫颈环扎试验(CIPRACT):研究设计与初步结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;183(4):823-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108874.
7
Cervical length and delivery outcomes in patients with prophylactic cervical cerclage.预防性宫颈环扎术患者的宫颈长度与分娩结局。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):273-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270110. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
8
Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study.宫颈扩张 16 至 24 周的双胎妊娠行宫颈环扎术:回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):98.e1-98.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.172. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
9
Anterior uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of cerclage failure.子宫颈前角测量可改善宫颈环扎术失败的预测。
J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;37(4):375-379. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.241. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study.妊娠中期宫颈环扎术:一项历史性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1447-54; discussion 1454-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114854.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.既往史指征与超声指征宫颈环扎术后妊娠结局的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0328564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328564. eCollection 2025.
2
Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements and Prediction of Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss: a Nomogram Model Analysis.孕中期妊娠丢失的早期磁共振成像测量及预测:列线图模型分析
Int J Womens Health. 2024 May 14;16:819-827. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S453867. eCollection 2024.
3
Current Approaches to Risk Assessment and Prevention of Preterm Birth-A Continuing Public Health Crisis.
早产风险评估与预防的当前方法——持续的公共卫生危机
Ochsner J. 2020 Winter;20(4):426-433. doi: 10.31486/toj.20.0005.
4
A comparison of emergency and therapeutic modified Shirodkar cerclage: an analysis of 38 consecutive cases.紧急与治疗性改良希罗德卡尔宫颈环扎术的比较:38例连续病例分析
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;16(1):1-6. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.33410. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.急性宫颈功能不全且无羊膜腔内感染/炎症的患者,经环扎术治疗后预后良好。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Jul 26;47(5):500-509. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0388.
6
Adjuvant 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in women with history-indicated cerclage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.有指征行宫颈环扎术史的妇女中应用辅助 17-羟孕酮己酸酯:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Feb;98(2):139-153. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13488. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
7
Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.超声检查宫颈短、有早产史且单胎妊娠的孕妇,应用阴道孕酮与宫颈环扎预防早产的效果比较:系统评价和间接比较荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):42.e1-42.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.877. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
8
Prevention of preterm birth based on a short cervix: cerclage.基于短宫颈的早产预防:宫颈环扎术。
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Oct;33(5):325-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.06.005.
9
Recurrent preterm birth.复发性早产
Semin Perinatol. 2007 Jun;31(3):142-58. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.04.001.
10
The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?宫颈环扎术在产科实践中的作用:能否识别出可从该手术中获益的患者?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.002.