Novy M J, Gupta A, Wothe D D, Gupta S, Kennedy K A, Gravett M G
Division of Reproductive Sciences, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, Beaverton 97006, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1447-54; discussion 1454-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114854.
The purpose of this study was to compare second-trimester transvaginal cervical cerclage with conservative management on duration of pregnancy and perinatal outcome in patients with early or advanced cervical changes.
A historical cohort analysis was performed. Maternal and neonatal records between 1995 and 1999 were retrospectively reviewed for women presenting between 18 and 27 weeks of gestation with early cervical changes (length <3 cm, dilatation <2 cm, funneling of fetal membranes shown by transvaginal ultrasonography) (group 1, n = 31) and for women with advanced cervical effacement and dilatation (cervical dilatation > or =2 cm but < or =5 cm, fetal membranes visible) (group 2, n = 39). In each group, patients who underwent Shirodkar or McDonald cerclage were compared with patients treated conservatively with bed rest. Both groups also received multifactorial treatment with tocolytic agents, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and indomethacin. Outcome variables were analyzed for statistical significance by parametric and nonparametric methods.
Regardless of treatment method, patients with early cervical changes (group 1) were given a diagnosis earlier and delivered later in pregnancy compared with their counterparts who had advanced cervical changes (group 2) (P <.05). In both patients who underwent cerclage and those treated conservatively, the mean birth weight among surviving infants was higher and the mean neonatal intensive care unit stay was shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (P <.02). However, duration of maternal hospital stay and neonatal survival rates were not different. In both groups 1 and 2, the interval from treatment to delivery, the mean gestational age at delivery, and mean birth weight were increased, whereas neonatal intensive care unit stay was decreased by cerclage treatment (P <.05). In group 1, a higher percentage of patients treated with cerclage received antibiotics and indomethacin than did control subjects (P <.01), whereas in group 2, the use of multifactorial treatment was not different (P =.5). The duration of maternal hospital stay and neonatal survival did not differ significantly among patients treated conservatively or with cerclage.
Diagnosis of premature cervical changes by ultrasonography was correlated with treatment earlier in gestation and with a favorable impact on perinatal outcome in both patients treated with cerclage and those treated conservatively. Cervical cerclage was associated with an improved perinatal outcome (in comparison with conservative therapy) in women with early cervical changes detected by ultrasonography and in patients with advanced cervical dilatation and visible membranes. However, the apparent therapeutic effect of cerclage in patients with mild cervical incompetence may be due in part to an increased use of antibiotics and indomethacin in conjunction with cerclage.
本研究旨在比较孕中期经阴道宫颈环扎术与保守治疗对宫颈改变早期或晚期患者的妊娠持续时间和围产期结局的影响。
进行了一项历史性队列分析。回顾性分析1995年至1999年间妊娠18至27周出现宫颈早期改变(长度<3 cm,扩张<2 cm,经阴道超声显示胎膜漏斗状)的妇女(第1组,n = 31)以及宫颈消退和扩张晚期(宫颈扩张≥2 cm但≤5 cm,可见胎膜)的妇女(第2组,n = 39)的母婴记录。在每组中,将接受希罗德卡尔或麦克唐纳环扎术的患者与卧床休息保守治疗的患者进行比较。两组均接受了宫缩抑制剂、广谱抗生素和吲哚美辛的多因素治疗。采用参数和非参数方法分析结局变量的统计学意义。
无论治疗方法如何,与宫颈改变晚期的患者(第2组)相比,宫颈改变早期的患者(第1组)诊断更早且妊娠晚期分娩(P<.05)。在接受环扎术和保守治疗的患者中,第1组存活婴儿的平均出生体重更高,新生儿重症监护病房住院时间更短(P<.02)。然而,产妇住院时间和新生儿存活率没有差异。在第1组和第2组中,环扎治疗使从治疗到分娩的间隔、平均分娩孕周和平均出生体重增加,而新生儿重症监护病房住院时间减少(P<.05)。在第1组中,接受环扎术治疗的患者使用抗生素和吲哚美辛的比例高于对照组(P<.01),而在第2组中,多因素治疗的使用没有差异(P =.5)。保守治疗或环扎术治疗的患者之间产妇住院时间和新生儿存活率没有显著差异。
超声诊断宫颈过早改变与妊娠早期治疗相关,对接受环扎术治疗和保守治疗的患者的围产期结局均有有利影响。对于超声检测到宫颈早期改变的妇女以及宫颈扩张晚期且可见胎膜的患者,宫颈环扎术与围产期结局改善相关(与保守治疗相比)。然而,宫颈环扎术在轻度宫颈机能不全患者中的明显治疗效果可能部分归因于与环扎术联合使用的抗生素和吲哚美辛的增加。