Hobza Pavel, Sponer Jirí
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Center for Complex Molecular Systems and Biomolecules, Dolejskova 3, 182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic.
J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Oct 2;124(39):11802-8. doi: 10.1021/ja026759n.
Stacking energies in low-energy geometries of pyrimidine, uracil, cytosine, and guanine homodimers were determined by the MP2 and CCSD(T) calculations utilizing a wide range of split-valence, correlation-consistent, and bond-functions basis sets. Complete basis set MP2 (CBS MP2) stacking energies extrapolated using aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, and for pyrimidine dimer Q) basis sets equal to -5.3, -12.3, and -11.2 kcal/mol for the first three dimers, respectively. Higher-order correlation corrections estimated as the difference between MP2 and CCSD(T) stacking energies amount to 2.0, 0.7, and 0.9 kcal/mol and lead to final estimates of the genuine stacking energies for the three dimers of -3.4, -11.6, and -10.4 kcal/mol. The CBS MP2 stacking-energy estimate for guanine dimer (-14.8 kcal/mol) was based on the 6-31G(0.25) and aug-cc-pVDZ calculations. This simplified extrapolation can be routinely used with a meaningful accuracy around 1 kcal/mol for large aromatic stacking clusters. The final estimate of the guanine stacking energy after the CCSD(T) correction amounts to -12.9 kcal/mol. The MP2/6-31G(0.25) method previously used as the standard level to calculate aromatic stacking in hundreds of geometries of nucleobase dimers systematically underestimates the base stacking by ca. 1.0-2.5 kcal/mol per stacked dimer, covering 75-90% of the intermolecular correlation stabilization. We suggest that this correction is to be considered in calibration of force fields and other cheaper computational methods. The quality of the MP2/6-31G(0.25) predictions is nevertheless considerably better than suggested on the basis of monomer polarizability calculations. Fast and very accurate estimates of the MP2 aromatic stacking energies can be achieved using the RI-MP2 method. The CBS MP2 calculations and the CCSD(T) correction, when taken together, bring only marginal changes to the relative stability of H-bonded and stacked base pairs, with a slight shift of ca. 1 kcal/mol in favor of H-bonding. We suggest that the present values are very close to ultimate predictions of the strength of aromatic base stacking of DNA and RNA bases.
利用多种分裂价、相关一致和键函数基组,通过MP2和CCSD(T)计算确定了嘧啶、尿嘧啶、胞嘧啶和鸟嘌呤同二聚体低能几何结构中的堆积能。使用aug-cc-pVXZ(X = D、T,对于嘧啶二聚体为Q)基组外推得到的完全基组MP2(CBS MP2)堆积能,前三个二聚体分别为-5.3、-12.3和-11.2 kcal/mol。估计为MP2和CCSD(T)堆积能之差的高阶相关校正量分别为2.0、0.7和0.9 kcal/mol,从而得到这三个二聚体真实堆积能的最终估计值为-3.4、-11.6和-10.4 kcal/mol。鸟嘌呤二聚体的CBS MP2堆积能估计值(-14.8 kcal/mol)基于6-31G(0.25)和aug-cc-pVDZ计算。这种简化的外推方法对于大型芳香堆积簇通常可以在约1 kcal/mol的有意义精度下使用。CCSD(T)校正后鸟嘌呤堆积能的最终估计值为-12.9 kcal/mol。先前用作计算数百种核碱基二聚体几何结构中芳香堆积标准水平的MP2/6-31G(0.25)方法,系统地低估了碱基堆积,每个堆积二聚体约低估1.0 - 2.5 kcal/mol,涵盖了75 - 90%的分子间相关稳定化。我们建议在力场和其他更便宜的计算方法的校准中考虑这种校正。然而,MP2/6-31G(0.25)预测的质量比基于单体极化率计算所建议的要好得多。使用RI-MP2方法可以快速且非常准确地估计MP2芳香堆积能。CBS MP2计算和CCSD(T)校正一起使用时,对氢键结合和堆积碱基对的相对稳定性仅带来微小变化,有利于氢键结合的方向有大约1 kcal/mol的轻微偏移。我们认为当前的值非常接近DNA和RNA碱基芳香碱基堆积强度的最终预测值。