Effect of forward and reverse selection for ethanol-induced locomotor response on other measures of ethanol sensitivity.

BACKGROUND

Ethanol sensitivity may be a predictor of genetic predisposition to ethanol abuse. To examine ethanol sensitivity in rodents, two lines of mice were bred in replicate for high (FAST-1 and -2) and low (SLOW-1 and -2) locomotor stimulant responses to ethanol. After large differences between the lines developed and further response to selection seemed to have arrested, reverse selection was initiated by breeding the slowest FAST mice with each other and the fastest SLOW mice with each other. The reverse-selected lines, named r-FAST and r-SLOW, were virtually equally sensitive to the stimulant effects of the selection dose of ethanol after 16 generations of reverse selection.

METHODS

These experiments used this unique genetic model to examine two responses, putatively genetically correlated with sensitivity to ethanol stimulation: handling-induced convulsions during chronic ethanol withdrawal, and ethanol-induced hypothermia. Ethanol clearance, for which a small difference was previously found between the FAST and SLOW lines, was also examined.

RESULTS

Handling-induced convulsions during chronic ethanol withdrawal were significantly greater in both FAST lines compared with both SLOW lines. Reverse selection eliminated the difference between the replicate 1 lines but did not alter the difference between the replicate 2 lines. Ethanol-induced hypothermia was greater in both SLOW lines compared with the FAST lines. This difference was significantly reduced by reverse selection in r-SLOW mice only. Ethanol clearance rates were similar among all lines and replicates.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the usefulness of reverse-selected lines for examining putatively genetically correlated traits. Changes in the correlated traits demonstrated the existence of persistent trait-relevant genetic heterogeneity and some genetic overlap between the correlated traits and the selection trait. Absence of a change after reverse selection suggests that trait-relevant genetic heterogeneity was eliminated by forward selection or, alternatively, that the trait was not influenced by genes associated with successful reverse selection.