Suppr超能文献

经皮自膨式金属支架与内镜下聚乙烯内支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的随机临床试验

Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Piñol Virgínia, Castells Antoni, Bordas Josep M, Real M Isabel, Llach Josep, Montañà Xavier, Feu Faust, Navarro Salvador

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Institut de Malalties Digestives, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):27-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2243011517.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare percutaneous self-expanding metal stents with conventional endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction by means of a prospective randomized clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biliary obstruction due to inoperable primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bile ducts or regional lymph node metastases were included. Evaluated outcomes included technical and therapeutic success rates, morbidity and 30-day mortality rates, hospital stay length and readmission, biliary reobstruction, and overall survival rates. Data were analyzed according to both the intention-to-treat principle and the treatment actually administered. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier method) and multivariate (Cox model) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

After randomization, 28 patients were assigned to receive a percutaneous self-expanding metal stent and 26 patients to receive a 12-F endoscopic polyethylene prosthesis. The technical success rates of both implantation procedures were similar (percutaneous, 75% [21 of 28 patients]; endoscopic, 58% [15 of 26 patients]; P =.29), whereas therapeutic success was higher in the percutaneous group (71% [20 of 28 patients] vs 42% [11 of 26 patients]; P =.03). However, major complications were more common in the percutaneous group (61% [17 of 28 patients] vs 35% [nine of 26 patients]; P =.09) but did not account for differences in 30-day mortality rates (percutaneous, 36% [10 of 28 patients]; endoscopic, 42% [11 of 26 patients]; P =.83). Overall median survival was significantly higher in the percutaneous group than in the endoscopic group (3.7 vs 2.0 months; P =.02). Cox regression analysis enabled identification of placement of the percutaneous self-expanding metal stent as the only independent predictor of survival (relative risk, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.31; P =.02).

CONCLUSION

Placement of a percutaneous self-expanding metal stent is an alternative to placement of an endoscopic polyethylene endoprosthesis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

摘要

目的

通过一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较经皮自膨式金属支架与传统内镜下聚乙烯内支架治疗恶性胆管梗阻的效果。

材料与方法

纳入因无法手术切除的胰腺癌、胆囊癌或胆管癌或区域淋巴结转移导致胆管梗阻的患者。评估的结果包括技术成功率和治疗成功率、发病率和30天死亡率、住院时间和再入院情况、胆管再梗阻以及总生存率。数据根据意向性治疗原则和实际给予的治疗进行分析。进行了单因素(Kaplan-Meier法)和多因素(Cox模型)分析。

结果

随机分组后,28例患者被分配接受经皮自膨式金属支架,26例患者接受12F内镜下聚乙烯支架。两种植入手术的技术成功率相似(经皮,75%[28例患者中的21例];内镜,58%[26例患者中的15例];P = 0.29),而经皮组的治疗成功率更高(71%[28例患者中的20例]对42%[26例患者中的11例];P = 0.03)。然而,主要并发症在经皮组更常见(61%[28例患者中的17例]对35%[26例患者中的9例];P = 0.09),但未导致30天死亡率的差异(经皮,36%[28例患者中的10例];内镜,42%[26例患者中的11例];P = 0.83)。经皮组的总体中位生存期显著高于内镜组(3.7个月对2.0个月;P = 0.02)。Cox回归分析确定经皮自膨式金属支架的置入是生存的唯一独立预测因素(相对风险,2.19;95%CI:1.11,4.31;P = 0.02)。

结论

对于恶性胆管梗阻患者,经皮自膨式金属支架置入是内镜下聚乙烯内支架置入的一种替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验