Knyrim K, Wagner H J, Pausch J, Vakil N
First Med. Clinic, Municipal Clinic, Kassel, Germany.
Endoscopy. 1993 Mar;25(3):207-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010294.
Endoscopic insertion of biliary stents is the preferred method of palliation for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction; however, migration and clogging are frequent problems with conventional endoprostheses. We sought to determine if expandable metal stents offer improved palliation compared to conventional stents. Sixty-two patients with common bile duct lesions were randomized to receive polyethylene or metal stents. Stents were placed endoscopically or by the combined percutaneous-endoscopic route. Early results (< 1 month) were similar in both groups. Long-term follow-up (n = 28 polyethylene, median: 5 months; n = 27 metal, median: 5 months) showed a higher stent failure rate in the polyethylene (n = 12; 43%) compared to the metal group (n = 6; 22%). The incidence of cholangitis was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the polyethylene (n = 10; 36%) compared to the metal group (n = 4; 15%). Life-table analysis showed a significantly reduced incidence of stent failure (p = 0.0035) in the metal stent compared to the polyethylene group. The total duration of hospital stay for treatment of stent related problems was significantly higher in the polyethylene (11.8 +/- 3 days) compared to the metal group (4 +/- 1.9 days; p = 0.02). The costs for retreatment because of stent failure were significantly higher in the plastic (DM 5900 +/- 1516) compared to the metal group (DM 2070 +/- 977). As a result, the overall costs (treatment of stent related complications & stents) were higher in the polyethylene group (DM 6000 +/- 1500).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
内镜下插入胆管支架是无法手术的恶性胆管梗阻的首选姑息治疗方法;然而,传统内支架的移位和堵塞是常见问题。我们试图确定与传统支架相比,可扩张金属支架是否能提供更好的姑息治疗效果。62例胆总管病变患者被随机分为接受聚乙烯或金属支架组。支架通过内镜或经皮-内镜联合途径放置。两组的早期结果(<1个月)相似。长期随访(聚乙烯组n = 28,中位数:5个月;金属组n = 27,中位数:5个月)显示,聚乙烯组的支架失败率(n = 12;43%)高于金属组(n = 6;22%)。聚乙烯组的胆管炎发生率(n = 10;36%)显著高于金属组(n = 4;15%)(p < 0.05)。生存分析表明,与聚乙烯组相比,金属支架的支架失败发生率显著降低(p = 0.0035)。聚乙烯组因支架相关问题的住院总天数(11.8 +/- 3天)显著高于金属组(4 +/- 1.9天;p = 0.02)。塑料支架因支架失败再次治疗的费用(DM 5900 +/- 1516)显著高于金属组(DM 2070 +/- 977)。因此,聚乙烯组的总体费用(支架相关并发症治疗和支架费用)更高(DM 6000 +/- 1500)。(摘要截断于250字)