Kamal-Bahl Sachin, Doshi Jalpa, Campbell James
Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 506 W Fayette St, Suite 113, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Oct;156(10):1034-41. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.10.1034.
To systematically review all published economic analyses of the only 2 available agents for respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylaxis in high-risk infants: respiratory syncytial virus immunoglobulin intravenous and palivizumab.
Economic evaluations of respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylactic agents were identified from the MEDLINE and HealthSTAR databases using various combinations of the following search terms: respiratory syncytial virus immunoglobulin intravenous, palivizumab, cost, and cost-effectiveness. The search was limited to articles published in English between January 1, 1990, and August 31, 2001. Additional studies were obtained by searching bibliographies of all relevant identified articles.
Only studies that performed an economic analysis of either or both of these agents in an infant population were included. Letters to the editor and commentaries that included informal economic analyses were excluded. Twelve of the 21 identified studies met the selection criteria.
Two of us (S.K.-B. and J.D.) independently reviewed the articles and extracted summary information using a standardized abstraction form, with differences resolved by consensus.
Estimates ranging from cost savings to considerable incremental costs per hospitalization avoided with use of either agent were observed across studies. Studies comparing the 2 agents reported mixed results about their relative cost-effectiveness in different infant subgroups. The divergent results may be explained by differences in the study methods and assumptions, but they also reflect the poor quality of some of the economic analyses.
In light of the issues identified in this review, providers, payers, and health policymakers need to critically appraise and judiciously interpret cost-effectiveness research on these agents.
系统回顾已发表的关于高危婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒免疫预防的仅有的两种可用药物的所有经济分析:静脉注射呼吸道合胞病毒免疫球蛋白和帕利珠单抗。
使用以下检索词的各种组合,从MEDLINE和HealthSTAR数据库中识别呼吸道合胞病毒免疫预防药物的经济评估:静脉注射呼吸道合胞病毒免疫球蛋白、帕利珠单抗、成本和成本效益。检索仅限于1990年1月1日至2001年8月31日期间以英文发表的文章。通过检索所有相关已识别文章的参考文献获得其他研究。
仅纳入对婴儿群体中这两种药物中的一种或两种进行经济分析的研究。排除包含非正式经济分析的致编辑信和评论。所识别的21项研究中有12项符合选择标准。
我们两人(S.K.-B.和J.D.)独立审查文章,并使用标准化的摘要形式提取汇总信息,分歧通过协商解决。
在各项研究中观察到,使用这两种药物中的任何一种,从节省成本到每避免一次住院有相当大的增量成本的估计都有。比较这两种药物的研究报告了它们在不同婴儿亚组中的相对成本效益的混合结果。结果的差异可能由研究方法和假设的不同来解释,但它们也反映了一些经济分析的质量较差。
鉴于本综述中确定的问题,提供者、支付方和卫生政策制定者需要严格评估并明智地解释关于这些药物的成本效益研究。