Wang H-L, Miyauchi M, Takata T
Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Periodontal Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):340-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01625.x.
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has proved to be a suitable and somehow predictable technique for promoting bone regeneration. A variety of synthetic and naturally derived GBR barriers have been used in clinics to facilitate bone regeneration. These barriers may differ in composition and structure and these may affect the outcomes of GBR. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the in vitro ability of osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) to attach to various GBR membranes.
Six GBR/GTR (guided tissue regeneration) membranes [BioMend (BM), Resolut (RL), Guidor (GD), EpiGuide (EG), Gore-Tex (GT) and Millipore filter (MP)] were tested. For controls, cells were directly plated on culture dishes (CD). Each test membrane was secured to the bottom of a culture dish with a double-sided adhesive tape. All samples were triplicate. At 1.5 and 24 h after plating of 2 ml (5 x 10(4) cells/ml) of MC3T3-E1 (passage 7) cells, the specimens were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline to wash out any unattached cells and then fixed with a 10% buffered formalin solution for 1 d. After washing with distilled water, the cells were stained with hematoxylin. The number of attached cells was counted under a light microscope equipped with an ocular-micrometer in a unit area of 0.25 mm(2) (five areas on each membrane). In addition, cell morphology attached to the membranes was evaluated under scanning electron microscope.
Data were presented as mean +/- standard error and analyzed for statistical difference using a generalized Wilcoxon's test. Cell attachment at 1.5 h was as follows: MP (27.5 +/- 2.1) > RL (17.0 +/- 1.4) approximately equals BM (14.5 +/- 1.4) approximately equals EG (11.4 +/- 1.0) > GD (5.2 +/- 0.8) approximately equals GT (3.1 +/- 0.6); and at 24 h was: MP (67.6 +/- 3.6) > RL (35.8 +/- 1.8) > BM (15.4 +/- 0.9) approximately equals EG (13.3 +/- 1.3) > GD (5.9 +/- 0.7) approximately equals GT (5.6 +/- 1.3). At 24 h, the scanning electron microscope finding revealed that cells attached on MP, RL, BM and EG were flatter in shape, like cells on CD, than cells on GD and GT, where cells were rather round.
Results from this study suggested that MP, BM, RL and EG enhanced the early osteoblast attachment. However, the true benefit of this observation in clinic remains to be determined.
引导骨再生(GBR)已被证明是一种促进骨再生的合适且具有一定可预测性的技术。临床上已使用多种合成和天然来源的GBR屏障来促进骨再生。这些屏障在组成和结构上可能有所不同,这可能会影响GBR的效果。因此,本研究旨在评估成骨细胞(MC3T3-E1)在体外附着于各种GBR膜的能力。
测试了六种GBR/引导组织再生(GTR)膜[BioMend(BM)、Resolut(RL)、Guidor(GD)、EpiGuide(EG)、Gore-Tex(GT)和微孔滤膜(MP)]。作为对照,将细胞直接接种在培养皿(CD)上。用双面胶带将每个测试膜固定在培养皿底部。所有样本均为一式三份。接种2 ml(5×10⁴细胞/ml)第7代MC3T3-E1细胞后1.5小时和24小时,用磷酸盐缓冲盐水冲洗标本以洗去未附着的细胞,然后用10%缓冲福尔马林溶液固定1天。用蒸馏水冲洗后,用苏木精对细胞进行染色。在配备目镜测微计的光学显微镜下,在0.25 mm²的单位面积(每个膜上五个区域)内计数附着细胞的数量。此外,在扫描电子显微镜下评估附着在膜上的细胞形态。
数据以平均值±标准误差表示,并使用广义威尔科克森检验分析统计差异。1.5小时时的细胞附着情况如下:MP(27.5±2.1)> RL(17.0±1.4)≈BM(14.5±1.4)≈EG(11.4±1.0)> GD(5.2±0.8)≈GT(3.1±0.6);24小时时为:MP(67.6±3.6)> RL(35.8±1.8)> BM(15.4±0.9)≈EG(13.3±1.3)> GD(5.9±0.7)≈GT(5.6±1.3)。24小时时,扫描电子显微镜观察发现,附着在MP、RL、BM和EG上的细胞形状比附着在GD和GT上的细胞更扁平,类似于培养皿上的细胞,而附着在GD和GT上的细胞则相当圆。
本研究结果表明,MP、BM RL和EG可增强成骨细胞的早期附着。然而,这一观察结果在临床上的真正益处仍有待确定。