Sparks Corey S, Jantz Richard L
Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 409 Carpenter Building, University Park 16802, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):14636-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222389599. Epub 2002 Oct 8.
In 1912, Franz Boas published a study demonstrating the plastic nature of the human body in response to changes in the environment. The results of this study have been cited for the past 90 years as evidence of cranial plasticity. These findings, however, have never been critiqued thoroughly for their statistical and biological validity. This study presents a reassessment of Boas' data within a modern statistical and quantitative genetic framework. The data used here consist of head and face measurements on over 8,000 individuals of various European ethnic groups. By using pedigree information contained in Boas' data, narrow sense heritabilities are estimated by the method of maximum likelihood. In addition, a series of t tests and regression analyses are performed to determine the statistical validity of Boas' original findings on differentiation between American and European-born children and the prolonged effect of the environment on cranial form. Results indicate the relatively high genetic component of the head and face diameters despite the environmental differences during development. Results point to very small and insignificant differences between European- and American-born offspring, and no effect of exposure to the American environment on the cranial index in children. These results contradict Boas' original findings and demonstrate that they may no longer be used to support arguments of plasticity in cranial morphology.
1912年,弗朗兹·博厄斯发表了一项研究,证明了人体在环境变化时具有可塑性。在过去的90年里,这项研究的结果一直被引为颅骨可塑性的证据。然而,这些发现从未因其统计和生物学有效性而受到彻底批判。本研究在现代统计和数量遗传学框架内对博厄斯的数据进行了重新评估。这里使用的数据包括对8000多名不同欧洲种族个体的头部和面部测量。通过使用博厄斯数据中包含的系谱信息,采用最大似然法估计狭义遗传力。此外,还进行了一系列t检验和回归分析,以确定博厄斯关于美国出生和欧洲出生儿童之间差异以及环境对颅骨形态的长期影响的原始发现的统计有效性。结果表明,尽管发育过程中存在环境差异,但头部和面部直径的遗传成分相对较高。结果表明,欧洲出生和美国出生的后代之间差异非常小且不显著,儿童接触美国环境对颅骨指数没有影响。这些结果与博厄斯的原始发现相矛盾,并表明它们可能不再被用来支持颅骨形态可塑性的观点。