Suppr超能文献

用于从临床标本中分离分枝杆菌的自动化分枝杆菌生长指示管系统(BACTEC 960/MGIT)与洛温斯坦-詹森培养基的比较

Comparison of the Automated Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube System (BACTEC 960/MGIT) with Löwenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.

作者信息

Lu Dongsi, Heeren Bobbi, Dunne W Michael

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 Oct;118(4):542-5. doi: 10.1309/65KN-2M7E-7MNN-X0TA.

Abstract

We examined whether the BACTEC/Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system alone could supplant the use of a supplemental Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) slant for routine recovery of Mycobacterium species from clinical specimens. A total of 6,062 specimens were included in the study. Of these, 273 specimens were positive for 278 mycobacterial isolates while 15 specimens were smear positive but culture negative using both media. Further analysis showed that 143 (51.4%) of the 278 total isolates were recovered from both the MGIT and LJ media. An additional 106 isolates (38.1%) were recovered from the MGIT only, while 29 (10.4%) isolates grew only on the LJ slant. The overall sensitivities of the MGIT and LJ media were 86.5% and 59.7%, respectively, for the recovery of mycobacteria from clinical materials. This study shows that although the MGIT system demonstrates better sensitivity for the recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens, both media types are necessary to maximize the sensitivity of detection.

摘要

我们研究了单独使用BACTEC/分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)系统是否可以取代补充使用罗-琴(LJ)斜面培养基从临床标本中常规分离分枝杆菌。该研究共纳入6062份标本。其中,273份标本检出278株分枝杆菌,另有15份标本涂片阳性但两种培养基培养均为阴性。进一步分析显示,278株分离菌中,143株(51.4%)可同时从MGIT和LJ培养基中分离得到。另外106株(38.1%)仅从MGIT培养基中分离得到,29株(10.4%)仅在LJ斜面培养基上生长。从临床标本中分离分枝杆菌时,MGIT和LJ培养基的总体敏感性分别为86.5%和59.7%。本研究表明,虽然MGIT系统在从临床标本中分离分枝杆菌方面显示出更高的敏感性,但两种培养基类型对于最大化检测敏感性都是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验