• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.用于预测压疮的风险评估量表常规使用的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 12;325(7368):797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797.
2
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.布拉登量表、诺顿量表和沃特洛量表在捷克共和国的预测效度。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1). doi: 10.1111/ijn.12499. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
3
Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.手术患者的压疮:Norton、Braden 和 Waterlow 风险评估量表的比较。
J Wound Care. 2022 Feb 2;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.2.170.
4
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
5
Braden Scale and Norton Scale modified by INSALUD in an acute care hospital: validity and cutoff point.INSALUD 在一家急症医院对Braden量表和Norton量表进行的修改:效度和临界点
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Nov;27(11):506-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000455077.71857.30.
6
The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands: a prospective inception cohort study.荷兰住院患者压疮的患病率和发病率:一项前瞻性起始队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Aug;44(6):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
7
Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.一种用于预测重症监护病房压疮的新风险评估量表的开发。
Nurs Crit Care. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00250.x.
8
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
9
Evaluation of the pressure ulcers risk scales with critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.危重症患者压力性溃疡风险评估量表的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):28-35. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0144.2521.
10
Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.压疮:两种风险评估量表的验证
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Mar;14(3):373-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01058.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammatory biomarkers in sebum for identifying skin damage in patients with a Stage I pressure ulcer in the pelvic region: A single centre observational, longitudinal cohort study with elderly patients.皮脂中的炎症生物标志物可识别盆腔 I 期压力性溃疡患者的皮肤损伤:一项针对老年患者的单中心观察性、纵向队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2594-2607. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14131. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
2
Could we prove the nursing outcomes utilising clinical data warehouse? Effectiveness of pressure ulcer intervention in Korean tertiary hospital.能否利用临床数据仓库来证明护理结局?韩国三级医院压疮干预的效果。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):201-209. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13865. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Braden 量表评估成人压力性损伤风险的预测效度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2194-2207. doi: 10.1002/nop2.792. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
The relationship between pressure injury complication and mortality risk of older patients in follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis.压力性损伤并发症与老年患者随访期间死亡风险的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13243. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
5
Reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries.减少医院获得性压疮
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Feb 13;8(1):e000464. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000464. eCollection 2019.
6
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4.
7
Exploring the role of pain as an early predictor of category 2 pressure ulcers: a prospective cohort study.探索疼痛作为2期压疮早期预测指标的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 20;7(1):e013623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013623.
8
Pressure ulcers in palliative ward patients: hyponatremia and low blood pressure as indicators of risk.姑息治疗病房患者的压疮:低钠血症和低血压作为风险指标
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Dec 29;12:37-44. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S122464. eCollection 2017.
9
A rabbit model for assessment of volatile metabolite changes observed from skin: a pressure ulcer case study.一种用于评估皮肤挥发性代谢物变化的兔模型:一项压疮病例研究。
J Breath Res. 2017 Jan 9;11(1):016007. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa51d7.
10
Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估压疮风险量表的预测效度——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2016 Feb;45(2):122-33.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a comparison of costs in medical vs. surgical patients.医院获得性压疮:内科患者与外科患者的成本比较
Nurs Econ. 1999 Sep-Oct;17(5):263-71.
2
Risk of pressure ulcer development in surgical patients: a review of the literature.外科手术患者发生压疮的风险:文献综述
Adv Wound Care. 1999 Apr;12(3):127-36.
3
Risk-assessment tools in the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Feb;45(2):20-6, 28, 30-4.
4
Risk-assessment scores, prevention strategies, and the incidence of pressure ulcers among the elderly in four Canadian health-care facilities.加拿大四家医疗保健机构中老年人的风险评估分数、预防策略及压疮发生率。
Can J Nurs Res. 1998 Summer;30(2):23-44.
5
Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.预测压疮风险:一项关于Braden量表预测效度的多中心研究。
Nurs Res. 1998 Sep-Oct;47(5):261-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199809000-00005.
6
Pressure sore risk calculators: some methodological issues.压疮风险评估工具:一些方法学问题。
J Clin Nurs. 1996 Sep;5(5):307-12. doi: 10.1111/jocn.1996.5.5.307.
7
Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.多变量预后模型:模型开发、评估假设与充分性以及测量和减少误差方面的问题。
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4.
8
Multi-site study of incidence of pressure ulcers and the relationship between risk level, demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and prescription of preventive interventions.压力性溃疡发病率的多中心研究以及风险水平、人口统计学特征、诊断与预防性干预措施处方之间的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Jan;44(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb05633.x.
9
The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales.在压疮预防中使用风险评估工具的基本原理,以及已发表量表的可靠性和有效性证据。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Aug;20(2):288-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020288.x.
10
The incidence of pressure sores within a National Health Service Trust hospital during 1991.1991年在一家国民保健服务信托医院内压疮的发生率。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):33-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010033.x.

用于预测压疮的风险评估量表常规使用的前瞻性队列研究。

Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.

作者信息

Schoonhoven Lisette, Haalboom Jeen R E, Bousema Mente T, Algra Ale, Grobbee Diederick E, Grypdonck Maria H, Buskens Erik

机构信息

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 Oct 12;325(7368):797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797
PMID:12376437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC128943/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether risk assessment scales can be used to identify patients who are likely to get pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two large hospitals in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

1229 patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological, or geriatric wards between January 1999 and June 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Occurrence of a pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse while in hospital.

RESULTS

135 patients developed pressure ulcers during four weeks after admission. The weekly incidence of patients with pressure ulcers was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.2% to 7.2%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.56 (0.51 to 0.61) for the Norton scale, 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) for the Braden scale, and 0.61 (0.56 to 0.66) for the Waterlow scale; the areas for the subpopulation, excluding patients who received preventive measures without developing pressure ulcers and excluding surgical patients, were 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77), 0.71 (0.64 to 0.78), and 0.68 (0.61 to 0.74), respectively. In this subpopulation, using the recommended cut-off points, the positive predictive value was 7.0% for the Norton, 7.8% for the Braden, and 5.3% for the Waterlow scale.

CONCLUSION

Although risk assessment scales predict the occurrence of pressure ulcers to some extent, routine use of these scales leads to inefficient use of preventive measures. An accurate risk assessment scale based on prospectively gathered data should be developed.

摘要

目的

评估风险评估量表是否可用于识别可能发生压疮的患者。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

荷兰的两家大型医院。

参与者

1999年1月至2000年6月期间入住外科、内科、神经科或老年病房的1229例患者。

主要观察指标

住院期间发生2级或更严重压疮的情况。

结果

135例患者在入院后四周内发生了压疮。压疮患者的每周发病率为6.2%(95%置信区间为5.2%至7.2%)。诺顿量表的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.56(0.51至0.61),布拉德恩量表为0.55(0.49至0.60),沃特洛量表为0.61(0.56至0.66);在排除未发生压疮却接受预防措施的患者以及外科患者的亚组中,相应的曲线下面积分别为0.71(0.65至0.77)、0.71(0.64至0.78)和0.68(0.61至0.74)。在该亚组中,使用推荐的切点,诺顿量表的阳性预测值为7.0%,布拉德恩量表为7.8%,沃特洛量表为5.3%。

结论

尽管风险评估量表在一定程度上可预测压疮的发生,但常规使用这些量表会导致预防措施使用效率低下。应基于前瞻性收集的数据开发一种准确的风险评估量表。