Suppr超能文献

用于预测压疮的风险评估量表常规使用的前瞻性队列研究。

Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.

作者信息

Schoonhoven Lisette, Haalboom Jeen R E, Bousema Mente T, Algra Ale, Grobbee Diederick E, Grypdonck Maria H, Buskens Erik

机构信息

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 Oct 12;325(7368):797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether risk assessment scales can be used to identify patients who are likely to get pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two large hospitals in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

1229 patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological, or geriatric wards between January 1999 and June 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Occurrence of a pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse while in hospital.

RESULTS

135 patients developed pressure ulcers during four weeks after admission. The weekly incidence of patients with pressure ulcers was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.2% to 7.2%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.56 (0.51 to 0.61) for the Norton scale, 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) for the Braden scale, and 0.61 (0.56 to 0.66) for the Waterlow scale; the areas for the subpopulation, excluding patients who received preventive measures without developing pressure ulcers and excluding surgical patients, were 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77), 0.71 (0.64 to 0.78), and 0.68 (0.61 to 0.74), respectively. In this subpopulation, using the recommended cut-off points, the positive predictive value was 7.0% for the Norton, 7.8% for the Braden, and 5.3% for the Waterlow scale.

CONCLUSION

Although risk assessment scales predict the occurrence of pressure ulcers to some extent, routine use of these scales leads to inefficient use of preventive measures. An accurate risk assessment scale based on prospectively gathered data should be developed.

摘要

目的

评估风险评估量表是否可用于识别可能发生压疮的患者。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

荷兰的两家大型医院。

参与者

1999年1月至2000年6月期间入住外科、内科、神经科或老年病房的1229例患者。

主要观察指标

住院期间发生2级或更严重压疮的情况。

结果

135例患者在入院后四周内发生了压疮。压疮患者的每周发病率为6.2%(95%置信区间为5.2%至7.2%)。诺顿量表的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.56(0.51至0.61),布拉德恩量表为0.55(0.49至0.60),沃特洛量表为0.61(0.56至0.66);在排除未发生压疮却接受预防措施的患者以及外科患者的亚组中,相应的曲线下面积分别为0.71(0.65至0.77)、0.71(0.64至0.78)和0.68(0.61至0.74)。在该亚组中,使用推荐的切点,诺顿量表的阳性预测值为7.0%,布拉德恩量表为7.8%,沃特洛量表为5.3%。

结论

尽管风险评估量表在一定程度上可预测压疮的发生,但常规使用这些量表会导致预防措施使用效率低下。应基于前瞻性收集的数据开发一种准确的风险评估量表。

相似文献

10
Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.压疮:两种风险评估量表的验证
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Mar;14(3):373-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01058.x.

引用本文的文献

5
Reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries.减少医院获得性压疮
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Feb 13;8(1):e000464. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000464. eCollection 2019.
6
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验