• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在压疮预防中使用风险评估工具的基本原理,以及已发表量表的可靠性和有效性证据。

The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales.

作者信息

Edwards M

机构信息

Department of Nursing Studies, King's College London, England.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1994 Aug;20(2):288-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020288.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020288.x
PMID:7930147
Abstract

Recent studies have shown an increase in pressure sore prevalence rates. However, methodological inconsistencies and demographic considerations, which include an ageing population, make it difficult to interpret and compare results. A multiplicity of intrinsic and extrinsic factors are thought to be associated with increased risk. The development of risk calculators which incorporate these factors has been an attempt to identify which subjects are most at risk so that equipment and nursing interventions can be allocated appropriately. Since the 1960s there has been a proliferation of risk assessment scales which have not been subjected to rigorous scrutiny of their reliability and validity, and this is held to represent a failure of nursing research. Recent evidence suggests that if critical cut-off points for 'at-risk' vs. 'no risk' are adjusted for particular patient populations the validity of existing scales can be improved. Missing from the literature are research reports of studies carried out in the community. As a result of demographic changes and community care policies, more 'at-risk' patients are likely to be nursed at home. Future research needs to include community studies, and a more systematic approach in general, to the study of the predictive value of existing scales.

摘要

近期研究表明压疮患病率有所上升。然而,方法上的不一致以及包括人口老龄化在内的人口统计学因素,使得结果难以解释和比较。多种内在和外在因素被认为与风险增加有关。开发包含这些因素的风险计算器,旨在识别哪些受试者风险最高,以便合理分配设备和护理干预措施。自20世纪60年代以来,风险评估量表大量涌现,但这些量表并未经过对其信度和效度的严格审查,这被认为是护理研究的一个失败之处。近期证据表明,如果针对特定患者群体调整“有风险”与“无风险”的临界值,现有量表的效度可以得到提高。文献中缺少在社区开展的研究报告。由于人口结构变化和社区护理政策,更多“有风险”的患者可能在家中接受护理。未来的研究需要纳入社区研究,总体上采用更系统的方法来研究现有量表的预测价值。

相似文献

1
The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales.在压疮预防中使用风险评估工具的基本原理,以及已发表量表的可靠性和有效性证据。
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Aug;20(2):288-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020288.x.
2
Pressure sore risk calculators: some methodological issues.压疮风险评估工具:一些方法学问题。
J Clin Nurs. 1996 Sep;5(5):307-12. doi: 10.1111/jocn.1996.5.5.307.
3
The levels of reliability and validity of the Waterlow pressure sore risk calculator.沃特洛压疮风险评估量表的信度和效度水平。
J Wound Care. 1995 Sep;4(8):373-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1995.4.8.373.
4
Preventing pressure sores among wheelchair users.预防轮椅使用者的压疮
Prof Nurse. 2000 Feb;15(5):321-4.
5
Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.预防压疮的风险评估量表:一项系统综述
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(1):94-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03794.x.
6
Validity of the Walsall Community Pressure Sore Risk Calculator.沃尔索尔社区压疮风险计算器的有效性。
Br J Nurs. 1999;8(17):1142-4, 1146, 1148 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.17.6505.
7
Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.风险评估量表的评分者间信度。
Prof Nurse. 1996 Aug;11(11):751-2, 755-6.
8
Developing a pressure sore risk assessment scale.开发一种压疮风险评估量表。
Prof Nurse. 1997 Feb;12(5):341-6, 348.
9
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population.布拉登量表对养老院人群压疮风险的预测效度。
Res Nurs Health. 1994 Dec;17(6):459-70. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770170609.
10
A comparison of three risk assessment scales.三种风险评估量表的比较。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Jun;14(9):629-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic use of donut-shaped cushion to reduce sacral pressure injuries during open heart surgery.在心脏直视手术期间预防性使用环形垫以减少骶骨压力性损伤。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):17-23. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_415_21. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Surgical Treatment of 55 Patients with Pressure Ulcers at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Kosovo during the Period 2000-2010: A Retrospective Study.2000 - 2010年科索沃整形与重建外科对55例压疮患者的手术治疗:一项回顾性研究
Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:129692. doi: 10.1155/2013/129692. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
3
Hip fracture and pressure ulcers - the Pan-European Pressure Ulcer Study - intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors.
髋部骨折与压疮——泛欧压疮研究——内在和外在风险因素
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(2):315-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00452.x.
4
Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment.住院患者压疮发生的预测:一种风险评估工具。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):65-70. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015362.
5
Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.用于预测压疮的风险评估量表常规使用的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 12;325(7368):797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797.
6
The clinical relevance of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale in the ICU.Waterlow压疮风险评估量表在重症监护病房中的临床相关性。
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Aug;24(8):815-20. doi: 10.1007/s001340050671.